/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13860194
nope

>>9936088
>> people make threads on biz about coins they think will succeed
> It's not like anyone posts anything on here out of the goodness of their hearts

Literally not a contradiction in any way.

>If it's such a great investment, why spend more than a day-job shilling this absolute shitcoin?

They haven't been doing a particularly good job at spreading awareness, so I'm doing my part.

What they've promised so far for the coming months is looking to change that, but only time will tell if it succeeds.

>Make a living, you cunt

I can do both.

>>9925906
What? That's exactly what I said?

There's very few asks below 1.9. 750k WYS on the ask side, and less than 100k of those at below 0.00019.

How is it a "heavy" ask side when there's asks for a miniscule portion of all tokens (750k of 60 million) for way above the recent average price?

TLDR: No one is really selling. If they were, there'd be more asks at 0.00012 no?

>>9514823
>My entire volume concerns have been since it was listed on IDEX, sooooo many shit coins that means absolutely nothing get stupid volume on IDEX, yet here is this supposedly godly gem, people are idiots if they aren't buying. So much support for the coin inside the thread, all FUD declared weak, but where is the action my dude? My FUD is relevant as fuck. If I truly thought I could make a lot of money in this investment I would invest, we are all here to make money. So why does this one seem so much shadier than everything else?

A lot of people have worried. We had like 70% FUD in Wysker threads about a month ago.

Then they have read about the project, the fundamentals, how the idea is being implemented, what they have managed to produce so far, and what the future seems to have in store.

And they've stopped worrying about the early volume issues of a token that isn't even on a CEX yet.

The potential is too high. The risk and reward here is immensely skewed toward reward.

>>9477195
Show me your best wys meme and i might fill some of it.

>>9463261
Brand awareness baby.

When Wysker starts it advertising soon people will go "Oh yeah I saw that huge ad on Time's square, must be a big thing" and download it as a consequence.

>>9430030
2.9b odd

So many people seem to come into WYS threads to post about their own tokens, it just makes your desperation shine through when your shit can't stand on it's own merits and you have to try and smear your competitors.

Meanwhile, Wysker is full steam ahead and couldn't care less about you. Must feel bad :(

Still early though, you could get onboard this train to independent wealth as well.

>>9388335
It started manually but it's constantly being automated more. Oftentimes human intervention is needed to make products fit within their algorithms, but as the machine learning component takes off this will decrease. Many similar items can be scraped/listed simultaneously.

>>9371333
Which part don't you understand my trips friend?

Not only do they get to see more shit, the more they prove themselves as a vapid consumer, the higher value their data set will be, thus subsiding their vapid consumption and makes using wysker the most cost effective way to do your vapid consumption.

Data is a massive market. If you profit of your data instead of zuckerberg, your goods effectively become cheaper.

>>9361984
Like, in a pet store? Or do they own the exchanges?

>>9351913
It's ridiculous you can offer such a gift to /biz/ but they're too used to distrusting everything that they miss a golden goose. Hopefully there are some anons who also get rich off this. Especially before the 2.0 shilling really takes off and plebbit starts getting involved.