/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58043365
I believe the “relative uncertainty” of our current day has never been at greater levels. I, certainly, especially after the dog and pony show that was the Plandemic and WEF marketing campaigns, have never felt less certain or secure in any aspect of my life, including sovereignty over my own physical body. I am not the type of person to conflict with authority, mouth off to cops, spit on politicians, but now I find myself theory-crafting scenarios where I employ deadly force as a means of self-defense and protecting my children on a daily basis. Men who stay in this mode long enough change. And, I am not sure that the powers that be want intelligent, moderately capable men theory-crafting nonstop about resisting government overreach, vigilantism and proactive asymmetrical security operations.

Then again, that type of thinking and behavior is exactly the type of enemy the Fed has been sword rattling about for years now and fits with their Problem Reaction Solution methodology. They create the problem via conditions they create->me, get a reaction->resisting unlawful/unconstitutional mandates/orders/statutes/ordinances,->reaction: hammer down with the states monopoly on violence and saturate “domestic terrorism on the rise” and “rural citizens are a danger to our democracy” with their media. Maybe it is best to not buy into any of it and be an empty headed Zen type of bozo, until some quack comes after you with a needle full of mystery juice or an “undocumented worker” busts into you house at 3am. Hard to not follow one’s natural instincts of self-preservation, which is what the Globalists are betting on for their narratives.

Relative Uncertainty x Time x Awareness/Access to Information/Historical Outcomes x Dependent Offspring=Establishment Threat Matrix Score, or something like that. I bet the Rand Corporation, Pentagon and other Spook Groups have it down to a science.