/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>56901566
It's happening tonight

>>56829732
>There doesn’t exists a single example of this rule being broken.
That is an interesting hypothesis, anon. Let’s do some digging and see if it holds true, shall we? Your post mentions the decentralized oracle network Chainlink (ticker: LINK). Let’s look at some price data for LINK, shall we?
2017 LINKBTC peak: 0.0001044
2020 LINKBTC peak: 0.001611

Contrary to your thesis, there is at least one example of a token setting a high against BTC in one bullrun, then setting a higher high against BTC in a subsequent bullrun. The fact that you put forward this thesis, then mentioned by name one project that unambiguously debunks it, shows that you did not do adequate research. While I appreciate your efforts to provide alpha to the /biz/ community, kindly do five minutes of googling before posting your next brilliant theory here. Thank you.

Sincerely,
A LINK marine

>>56607633
Agreed
>Verification not required.

My portfolio broke a new ATH ($200k) for the first time since Oct 2021 today

>>56434369
It’s most definitely needed, and its happening tonight!

>>56341377
basado

>>55614186
I am not surprised you ended up with such an impossible valuation, since your method did not consider fundamentals at all. Hope that helps!

Linkbros, the switch has been flipped

>>55588240
Happy birthday anon. Looking forward to meeting you at the yacht party

link fuddies literally have to read a full textbook on how to properly FUD these days. So many good things are coming.

>>53102332
Post hand mein neger

Just realized: chainlink singularity will only happen after cbdcs.
So for oracles to be important, smartcontracts have to be important first. And most smartcontracts involve payment. However, normies and companies will never pay in something like eth. They want to make their deals, the payment in usd or the fiat.

Face it, anons. Its the best crypto to hold.

You had FOUR years