/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55995904
>it emotionally wasn't sustainable for me
>I shilled some really good fucking plays here though
This is what pure elemental copium tastes like.
I'd recognize that chart any time. There's only one guy that would spam that chart, the BOIL kang himself, right before shilling BOIL straight into a 70% decline.

But I'm sure it was the emotions that did it, not the dogshit plays, the absolute degenerate gambling, the return to the mean wiping away all past profits and then some before he vanished into the night. To be fair, it was only ever 5 figs. Not the end of the world.

>>55372669
pic related, (you)

>>55300825
Pure cope. Actual retard.
You can sell your t-bills if you need access to the funds. That's literally what money market funds do when you shift your money in/out, except they're pocketing a small fee.
CDs are even worse. Objectively there's no reason to own a CD at rates below comparable duration treasuries. You take a penalty on the yield if you break the term and request to close it early, and in some cases the bank may outright deny your request. Plus treasuries have no solvency risk, although given your level of intelligence shown so far, it's unlikely you're talking about 250k+ here to where FDIC caps could come into play. Not that that's a meaningful risk with Goldman Sachs anyway.

To be clear, there's nothing wrong with leaving 1-2 months expenses in a checking account, or perhaps even more if you're lazy. That's a choice of convenience.
But actively making the decision to put money in these short term CDs being advertised at yields below t-bills is a sign of either absolute ignorance or legitimate mental retardation.

It continues to amaze me that you retards actually try to debate that there's a legitimate defense for your poor financial decisions.

>>55226163
>firing the CEO is bullish

>Apple singlehandedly tanking the market
>again
lmao

I honestly feel kind of bad for the BOIL kang at this point
>Bought BOIL at $9
>Held through massive 70% downturn
>Sold below $3 right before the bullish summer pricing finally started kicking in
>Hopped into SQQQ at $33 to fade the massive tech pump
>Already bagholding another 25% loss, and growing

Saddest of all, he remains delusional to this day, claiming victory despite the blatant failure of every position he shills.
Some people never learn. They are simply incapable of listening.

>Futures

>>54989231
I'm fine, I swear. I'm doing ok.

>>54945226
>BOIL
3$ is the new floor. No way we break below it again.

>>54930783
I need this

>futures