/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55113063
>solved the blockchain trilemma
Do you even know what that means?
>security:
see: >>55112008
>decentralization:
see pic rel
>scalability:
see again: >>55113028

>but it doesnt matter.
>its just seen as a scam by the market. It always will be. Its dead. Just let it go.
>not widely regarded as a "scam" like ICP is.
>Posting false facts trying to fud AVAX
>Thats from a guy (me) who doesn't own either of these two shitcoins.
Never seen so much cope in one post alone!

>>55088115
>>55088255
>>55088268
They claim that now they over cloud services (avacloud) when they rely on cloud services themselves.

>>55075934
>avacloud launched today
So its a cloud inside a cloud?

>>55073682
>Ava Cloud
>Relies on other clouds

>>55055577
>you still rely on AWS
the majority of AVAX nodes run on privately owned servers

>>53685093
ICP is a permissioned network so it's inherently centralized, that permission coming from a central authority. On the other hand, Avalanche is the most decentralized smart contract PoS network where the majority of nodes are run at home due to low hardware requirements for validators.
>avax runs on aws
not even close retard, see pic

green IDs gonna make it

>>53419167
>muh "controlled by AWS"
>ignores factual data
kek, typical low IQ ICP baggie

you go have fun with your permissioned centralized scam. meanwhile AVAX will remain the most decentralized smart contract platform in existence (ADA doesn't count because no contracts and Charles Hoskinson is a dark african nigger)

>>53271150
>dependent on aws
do you ICP niggers ever get tired of being wrong? easy as piss to setup a validator and it can run on anything. plus no slashing, so don't have to pray that your shitty ISP isn't going to fuck you out of generational wealth.

Now how do you setup a validator for ICP? oh right you need Dom's permission first, kek. centralized permissioned trash. You dumb fuck ICP victims don't have a single leg to stand on. Or any brain cells.

>>53232305
>retard detected
First off see pic rel. Second, AWS has had a dedicated AVAX validator offering for awhile now and they still make up less than the liveness threshold for the network, this announcement doesn't really change anything. Third avalanche can easily be run on consumer hardware such as a laptop so if people don't like how AWS handles things they can simply switch to running it themselves until a better solution is found.
What this announcement is showing is mainstream adoption of Avalanche in a huge way by the biggest cloud compute/storage player and is aimed mostly at institutional/corporate use cases where flipping the bird to Uncle Sam isn't really important. It doesn't change the fact that the primary network is permissionless and can be decentralized to the extreme. This of course makes desperate baggies very upset and causes them to shit up our threads with inane bullshit.

>>53227594
Also picrel. Meanwhile 100% of OP's shitcoin nodes live in centralize data farms. The cope is delicious

>>53225209
yes one centralized, permissioned, high latency, $0 TVL, sub-1000 TPS subnet at a time kek

>>53225541
>US Gubment
has totally contradictory opinions depending on which part of it you're talking to. It's irrelevant though because only 19% of Avalanche nodes are on AWS and they can easily be switched to run on consumer level hardware should something like you are saying be made the official policy of the US. Your pisschain has more nodes in US data centers than avalanche but please keep displaying your absolute asspained cope to the board.

>>53224729
Damn that article is bullish af
>>53225252
Akshually it was a septuple mint with bonus blocks
>>53225940
Wrong, aws nodes are only ~19% of the network and about 60% are hardware. See picrel and go fuck yourself kek