[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.57392322 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57392322

>>57391687
Believe it or not, wagies often enjoy the same shows that you or I might enjoy:
Game of Thrones
Rick and Morty
or Big Bang Theory

See, they're not so different from you or me.

>> No.57125420 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
57125420

>>57125254
So it's like driving around in a golf cart or electric mobility scooter,
except with the most idiotic seating position imaginable.

Oh and you get to wave the arms around, in case that seems like a useful thing to do.

>> No.55522227 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
55522227

>>55522136
I bought my house in Summer 2020.
I had started planning for it in Fall 2019, getting my credit set up, then applying for a loan in the spring of 2020.

Then of course in March everything went to shit.
Lockdowns, closed businesses. I was furloughed at work.
Nobody knew what would happen. Would rates fall lower? Would the economy crash? Would houses be worth anything?

But I went for it anyway. I found a house and made an offer.
I figured it would either go down as a great decision on my part, or really, really bad timing.
I got lucky.

What's my point? I guess that "it's still impossible to buy a house" is weird to say. As recently as three years ago was a great opportunity to buy a house, with good rates. Maybe it's impossible today, but it's not like you have to go back 20 years to remember when it was possible. What were you doing three years ago, and why didn't you buy then?

>> No.54541781 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, 1629596462854.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54541781

>>54539713

>> No.53486012 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
53486012

>>53481738
>Um... why is nobody talking about this?
Let's see ...
a VC-backed project that's 100% built upon manufactured hype by individuals hoping to pump their bags.
All "announcements" are incestuous relationships among companies owned by the same investors.

Anons, you're just riding along with some investors who are hoping to dupe the crypto community into buying into their hype. Maybe you'll get lucky and their plan will work, and you'll make money alongside them.
But none of this is "organic" ... buying HBAR is putting faith and hope that the investors are successful at making the token price increase. It's not about whether or not the project itself is successful.
It's like buying DOGE because you hope Elon will tweet about it and the price will go up.

Will it make you money? Maybe. Just don't forget to take your gains when you can.

>> No.52778810 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52778810

>>52778738
>Chainlink will dump 75m tokens starting q1 2023 I believe
Is there a dump as well? Or are you referring to the v.0.1 staking pool cap (currently 25M) which will increase to 75M "in the months after launch?"

https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-staking-roadmap/

The initial staking pool in v0.1 will be capped in size, offering distinct allotments to node operators, community members, and the coordinator of oracle networks. The pool will start with an aggregate size of 25M LINK tokens, with the planned goal of scaling to a pool size of 75M LINK tokens in the months after launch, based on demand. For future releases, it is planned for the pool size to further expand and for additional Data Feeds and oracle services to be supported.

>> No.51082283 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51082283

>>51082174
>holding LINK
>holding BTC
>ETH
I mean ... I hold all three of those, so I don't really get all butthurt when one performs better or worse than the other two.

>> No.30002436 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
30002436

>>30000866
checked

>> No.29703605 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29703605

>>29701729
How fucking hard do you have to seethe to take a screenshot of a 4chan conversation and then POST IT ON THE SAME 4CHAN BOARD to try to prove yourself?

>> No.24837131 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24837131

>>24836630
So does someone pay ethots or webcam chicks to pose like this with a handwritten timestamp, so to gain clout and legitimize their "see women are into crypto too" agenda?
Christ, WAKE UP SHEEPLE you're being sold to.
Notice how all (except maybe #4) have weird handwriting - looks like Russian speakers who learned to write in English as a second language.
So does someone just hire these chicks to pose? Why?

>> No.23764381 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23764381

>>23764194
Can't argue with this logic.
Thanks anon you just saved me from losing a lot of money.

>> No.22651858 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22651858

>>22651227
>I bought shitcoins at the top and sold at the bottom
well that's not what you want to do
do the opposite of that next time, it works a lot better when you sell at a price higher than you bought

>>22651038
>I'm an impatient greedy idiot who cannot manage assets
shit buddy I think we've all been there. don't be too hard on yourself. if you've still got 2.7 ETH then you've still got a seed that can grow.
Hell, I remember my first (of several) TERRIBLE trades. Once I even bought the WRONG COIN because it had the same ticker as the one I wanted to buy. heh
And I bought plenty of shitcoins back in 2017/2018 that crashed, hard.

But you learn from this, and you'll do better. Don't beat yourself up about it.

>> No.22355994 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22355994

>>22354183
>>22354331
>>22354411
>>22354481
>>22354816
>NDAs
If they had fucking NDAs about discussing SWIFT, the Chainlink employee setting up the questions wouldn't have set Hodge up with a question about SWIFT!
Surely he knows what they're allowed to discuss on this call.
Jesus CHRIST the cope in this thread.
THERE'S NO SWIFT CONNECTION

>> No.19215933 [View]
File: 338 KB, 200x141, enterprise.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19215933

>>19215642
>SIMPING FOR A LITERAL MONGOLOID
I was going to correct you, then I thought harder about the trans-continental migration across the Bering strait which ultimately led to the population of the Americas.
Smart anon, you're 100% correct early Americans (including ancestors of today's South and Central Americans, whose people weren't as severely displaced by European migrants like native North Americans) are absolutely of mongoloid descent.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]