/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>7920096
CMC will do it for us eventually. By 2025 BTC will be the alt, not LINK.

>>7819979
>mfw an azerbaijani cockwrangling BBS will give me a lifetime of creampies
I can't seem to find said reports on reddit.

>>7808121
He's better then zuck.

Zuck stole other peoples shit and made money for himself

Sergey creates the future of finance in his own image by making the future ran buy a bunch of over weight autistic internet shitposters.

>>7444434
LINK GOT THE GET FUCK YESSSS

>>6748872
MINISTER YOU, SERGEY

>>6202148
My last buy in for $12K sets me right up to a Colonel at 78K LINKie doodles

I will retire off of Passive Gains from staking.

So no I am never selling my stack.

>>6068481
We have a main net launching soon which would mean the partnership would involve a fully functioning product being used by enterprise, which would literally be the first major companies in the world using smart contracts for a daily practical process.

We would blast right past $100.

ChainLink has thousands of use cases so if the big boys are using them, so many others will be too.

Most LINK will be locked up in nodes. Demand will be so high.

Honestly guys we just want you to get rich with us. The FUD was just an inside joke and to help keep the price down so we could accumulate what is essentially guaranteed retirement and lamborghini vouchers.

But smart money is pouring in. There is no stopping the sleeping giant.

We will hit $50 by Main Network launch easily which will be earlier in 2018. EOY probably over $100. Considering TRON got the market cap it did, the most useful product in crypto will easily blast past such caps.

Most ChainLink (like my 70k Stack) will be staking in pools making passive income. Circulating supply will actually be low in reality.

Demand is intrinsically high because of 1) Being able to stake, and 2) To use the service you need LINK tokens to pay the node operators.

Without ChainLink, Smart Contracts cannot be used properly with real world data. You see the top coins in the 100? Most of them are in reality, a use case for ChainLink itself.

Without a Decentralized Oracle Network, Smart Contracts cannot safely and properly interact with offchain data. Companies stand to save billions from the trustless and automated nature of Smart Contracts, and with ChainLink, they can begin to implement them into their daily processes.

By the time it begins to be integrated, we will see $100/LINK, if not upwards of $250. Market Cap would allow this when you consider the sheer breadth of use cases the LINK network will oversee.

In the end of the Matrix, the Oracle was the real hero, who ended the war..

>>5694340
That I did, lad.

>>5665871
ebin

http://hackingdistributed.com/2017/06/15/town-crier/

>"We want to thank Intel for their close collaboration, particularly Mic Bowman and Kelly Olsen for their support and advice, Sergey Nazarov at SmartContract for supporting our alpha launch, and the Ethereum Foundation, especially Vitalik Buterin, Alex Van de Sande, and Vlad Zamfir, for their input on TC during early development."

Hmmmm
https://create.smartcontract.com/#/choose

Already Functioning Town Crier ChainLinks?

Hmmmmm it's almost as if the FUD was all bullshit.

>>4108630
Literally in OP

Confido will be using LINK as their oracle