/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11792300
Satoshi realized later on that trying to raise the blocksize would just create a shitstorm.

The good news is BTC is a better gold so we don't need niggers buying onchain KFC with it.

>>10616872
No, satoshi left it at 1MB knowing it was set in stone and people would be against raising it. He knew Bitcoin was inmutable and that was what would make it valuable on the first place. It was the way to keep people interested without chimping out about muh fees.

>>8971655
Satoshi confirmed people would be against niggers wanting big blocks. He also talked about how he made Bitcoin compatible with many transaction formats. Segwit was a softfork. Satoshi used softforks to add updates several times. Kill yourself.

>>4823995
You are a fucking retard. Even satoshi predicted people would be against increasing the blocksize. Hal Finney also pointed out at how it on-chain transaction wouldn't be able to deal with retardedly small transactions. Just end your life.

>>4823979
>more nodes
A corporation running 1000000000 nodes is less secure than 5000 nodes ran by separate entities on their basement.

>>4504311
In addition, satoshi was smart enough to predict how people would resist the change.

>>4492415
And later on, satoshi realized how people would oppose to USG running nodes on their datacenters so niggers can transact their coffee on the network.

>>4304202
Then he realized how people would be against it so they can keep running nodes instead of only jews.

>>4177895
Nice cryptographically signed email. And in the small chance it's legit, it is shameful to share private messages, specially a guy whose live depends on his anonimity, a guy that disappeared after Gavin went at the CIA for a picnic btw. In any case, satoshi's data was wrong at the time, which he realized later.

Here's actual satoshi in a more recent message, predicting how people would oppose to increase the blocksize in order to keep participating on it.