/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17059185
sold at $7300. you promised me $3.5K bobo you fucking faggot

wondering what type of dump we'll be waking up to tomorrow. it seems to dump around india standard time

>>15032692

>that just means its an amazing buying opportunity right now NANO is definitely going to explode

Buying opportunity for Nano was 2016 when people were buying ONE MILLION RaiBlocks for 2 BTC about $750. Those who bought then keep dumping whenever the price moves up. There are still over 150 Wallets with 100,000 or more Nano. Fucking retarded investment right now.

>>14664567

this scam also dumps on you. good luck with that.

>>14528007

How the fuck are you stupid enough to hold shit that they sold to a roomful of people in a crowdsale for $500K and those faggots who got everything have been dumping for 2 years? The price was over $0.60 2 years ago when it first came on exchanges and the dumping is not stopping anytime soon. Plus, the network is broken half the time even now, not sure how you expect this vaporware to work when the training wheels come off.

>>14371542

relatively speaking, this shit never even really pumped. why the fuck would anyone hold this?

AION - the blockchain that never stops dumping.

>>11457857

Moron. It was worth $240 and it was announced it was one of the coins that was being looked at by Coinbase this summer. It immediately pumped to $370. It's now worth $120.

These pumps are rolling the dice and hoping you time the buy right before everyone dumps a useless crypto that nobody wants. Most people are going to get fucked with this strategy.

>>11115573

> 97% of BTC is owned by 4% of addresses

This is close to true but it's also true that a fucking idiot. There are 22 Million BTC addresses created in 10 years. So yeah, a small percentage of active addresses own the majority of BTC.

> If you hold 1 or more BTC or more, then you are also in the top 3% of addresses that owns 96% of Bitcoin

> If you hold .1 BTC or more, then you are also in the top 11% of addresses that owns 99.1% of Bitcoin

> If you hold .01 BTC or more, then you are also in the top 30% of addresses that owns 99.87% of Bitcoin

100 Top addresses, however, own only 14% of BTC

1500 Top addresses only only 35% of BTC

On the other hand, top 100 addresses own 80% of XRP in circulation and Ripple pretty much owns all the XRP that aren't in circulation -- effectively 100 addresses own 95% of the supply

>>10800379

>The cost of mining

Comes from speculative demand. Speculative demand, higher prices, more miners, higher difficultly, higher cost of mining

> ICO prices

Comes from speculative demand


Come on man, value does not come from the cost of mining. The cost of mining adjusts to difficulty which is based on demand/price. And almost every single ICO will go to zero. ICOs are pure speculations on shittokens.

>>10725814

Nobody gives a fuck about Waves man

>>10438210

Fuck you OP. This is quite a dilemma. Now I am going to be spending the rest of the work day trying to come up with the most optimal use of money. I take this seriously because this is literally me.

>>9923468

> Cringy Roger Ver marketing ≠ BCH Takeover of Tokyo

BCH volume in BCH/JPY is like $2.5 Million. Basically nothing. BCH volume as a whole is also anemic.

The reason BCH value is so high is that so much is still locked up and there are some miners who are holding on to newly minted BCH trying to drive the price up. If we get into a longer deeper bear market, they will capitulate. The dumping of BCH might be epic.