/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53036233
>ETH actually works and has functional L2s
>Paying $75 each time you want to enter or exit an L2

>>28301567
>>28302135

Stupid fucking Bobos. There's absolutely zero resistance under $50K.

Go ahead, open your shorts so I can laugh.

>>26232150
DURR RENTCEL NO UNDERSTAND

Would Google hire a brainlet like me as an engineer if I agreed to work for minimum wage?

>>25064554
>its registered to a juice bar on grand cayman, literally untouchable.

You are wrong. They sold to mostly US retail buyers, and therefore the SEC can and will pursue and prosecute them.

>>24823227
>CLF and UUUU are still great buys.
>Buying the fucking 5-year top

Lyl, what a POWERFUL investing strategy you've got there.

>>23697570

They're futures contracts that automatically go to $1 if Trump wins and are redeemable for USDT.

>>23620856

Buying Trumpwin contracts gives you 3x on your money atm and it's a little more scientific than roulette.

>>22132736

Devs are crackheads. No confidence in their ability to deliver now.

>>21955750

You're shorting right before the stock becomes "cheaper" to the normies?

>>21932688
>>21933363
>>21933480

The absolute state of nu/biz/....

>>21711471

You don't understand Google's business model. They are like a toll booth for the internet, most of their revenue is from various ads.

It's a stable and secure business model, think of it as a utility, or gas pipeline company, but digit.

Amazon however is sketchy and I stay away from it.

>>21413367
>This was so painful to read. Chinks have worse english than pajeets

That doesn't change the fact that Sergey is market dumping tokens again, just like after the Google Coinbase pump and dump of 2019.

>>21259960

This is a 60% retracement to the EMA you idiot.

LINK pulls a hard +60% correction after every pump and dump.

I guess you retards are all NuLinkers who bought above $4. LINK did the same thing after the Google partnership hoax.

>>21001665

>Over 70% of premined tokens held by devs

>"Link supply drying up"

Lmao

>>20811712
>The closer we get to 4 digits

Once we get closer to true value, the price of LINK decreases exponentially, because the income from oracle fees will be MINISCULE.

Do you even debate this? Do you even know what the proposed business model of CHainlink is?

>>20663460
If you cannot figure that much out then I have one word for you. Leave.

>>19532547

They've rolled out partnerships and integrations with Wikimedia, PwC, Bee Token (lol) etc etc.

Where have those all gone?

>2017+3
>Partnership scams
>You

How can one be so new, retarded or conniving?

>>19268927

>700,000,000.00 tokens held by devs

Fuck no.

>>18953117

It's implied in their stupid tweets.

There is NO OTHER smart contract platform that has the commercial interest, research and development and ecosystem and support.

What, you faggots are going to be running your NEET nodes verifying transactions on centralized zombie chains like NEO, EOS?

Are you fucking kidding me?

You fucking cunt, go sit in your corner.

The absolute state of Bobos..

>>18863260

Because it's a typical crypto "partnership", meaning some bullshit non-existent association with no binding results and no consequences.

Just look at LINK.

>>18817918
>admit that i didnt take into account the stress that the spread of the highly infectious disease would create on well prepared hospitals □

> admit to anon that 'my' ideas are actually fox news' ideas and I can't defend them logically or think for myself □

> regurgitate my initial refuted invalid point without addressing (or probably reading) the core of anon's argument

>>18752734

>Paying for abandonware

Lmao, cryptocels continue to surprise me with the depths of their stupidity and willingness to throw money into a toilet.