/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20521231
You can play with its waifu for laifu, TMF. Mostly it protects against drawdowns because its the only fucking thing left in the market that is anti-correlated with it. The problem is that TMF has about 8 years of juice left before it starts tasting the dogshit bonds we have today from the 2008 GFC

>>20371101
What if I told you that you could multiply your cashflow AND compound interest?

Threadly reminder to ignore facebook boomers that think politics matters in the fucking slightest for the market.
>>20280481
OOOOOOOOOOOH

>>20221942
Sure, but you don't have to fully commit since you don't have the TMF hedge. TQQQ, and to a lesser extent your LQQ, will have ENORMOUS drawdowns if an actual second crash arrives. TMF is roughly anti-correlated with the market and it spikes when that happens. TMF is running out of fuel soon because bonds started being made into absolute garbage with the GCF in 2008.
This image shows a log scale and you can still see that massive drop be more pronounced in the 90/10 TQQQ/TMF than the even spread. Even still it did better than the unleveraged ETF but only through the bull market it existed in.
The drawdowns you could face won't be as bad as TQQQ's but you need to find something that anti-correlates that you have access to. Something that spiked starting in March. Otherwise you could just go in on it but you'd have to watch it like a hawk to buy out the second another dip seems imminent. That is (a) hard and (b) tedious to do over years. This plot, by the way, is with 10k invested in TOTAL. You don't have to go crazy here.

>>19740340
What about it?

>>19543369
Value investing has been dead for more than a decade. Boomer dividend investing has been dead since 1990's.

>>19529608
>Efficient Market hypothesis
Is bullshit. It is every bit an ad hoc fallacy as most TA tools.
>if there is all freely available information, why the fuck do Value and Size Funds still have investors
Value investors checked out in the 90s. Now its just a euphemism for fixed income retirees. Truly invincible value stocks are basically just bonds, and should be treated as such.
And that isn't the only thing that wrecks value and size fund investors

>>19519211
Bull Index ETFs are provided volatility is gone. There is a lot of downside risk to holding generally when the VIX is this high but you CAN hold those.

>>19456534
I don't want to get stuck in this same argument.
In short, divvy stocks should be thought of really as alternatives to T-Bills or T-Notes which really means they are alternative to bonds.

>>19257275
Just buy the fucking TQQQ

>>19230545

>>19202002
>Like another anon as said, if I'm going to have to babysit and fret over a growth stock, I'll buy a leap and take the gain multiplier if I called it right. Bagholding growth stocks is the worst of all worlds, but that's just this anons humble opinion.
A waste of time to hold boomer stocks. Value lost to growth in the 90s.

>>19170919
>>19170949
Big oof