/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14896207
I think some jannie felt sorry for the linkies here. I thoroughly BTFO every single one. Pic related is what happens when presented with the following painful truth.

>>”So you're creating a new type of product (Scam) that doesn't fit neatly into any existing (scam) categories and may or may not end up drawing the ire of US regulators at some point down the road. Why would you risk creating this product in the jurisdiction of a nation with heavy regulation? How many ICOs actually did this? Can you name some "legitimate" projects that did?

I’m glad you overcame your text stutter and finally fucking typed something out. Alright let me obliterate this. You can never do actual work in the US, with US companies trusting you if you do not have the oversight of the US authorities like what they have upon them. You’ll never do any real meaningful work like that unless you’re a foreign titan in a country with working laws.

Chainlink, operating out of a rented pidgeonhole in the Caymen Islands with no assets does not fit this description. Regulation means order and trust. I think it’s funny that the same companies that you’d like to see Chainlink ‘partner’ with are what they are because they’re American companies under the jurisdiction of the US, yet you’re now shitting on those same rules and laws being applied to Chainlink. Nice cognitive dissonance you got there lad.

It’s not even a new kind of product if it even existed as a product which it currently doesn’t. Enterprise API aggregation has been around for years. So all in all, fundamentally you have no valid points as to why Chainlink is registered in the Caymen’s out of a shoebox and Americans were barred from their ICO. I’m guessing you don’t genuinely believe what you typed out though, you’re just hoping someone else does.”

Linkies just don’t know what to say as always.

>>/biz/thread/14892962