/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57840293
But she's not your sister. Only OP can have the true "it's little my little sister" experience. For anyone else it's not the same at all.

From her perspective it's similar; sex with her "big bro" is magical and special -- it's not the same with some random guy.

You can't imagine how long I was waiting for a chance like this, to finally have the tools and platform to expose all of the subhuman parasites I've met in crypto since 2021. Especially the unhinged druggie serial rugger "devs" who think they own the world and are famous internet personalities, for copypasting CAs in remix. My revenge will be sweet, thorough and leave no one unscathed.
Down below are telegram usernames of people who specifically milked /biz/ and associated communities:

>I Hold Bags
>alectoris ines
>Nib the bear
>Kekromancer
>Arch Marcellus
>Anthony
>NC
>Maddy
>The Wheeler Dealer
>brokeapu
>Gino
>Mass Effect
>Figs
>Shadow
>Sofronio Bracamonte
>Casanova
>Serec
>Bruh Network
>Kurapika
>Freddy
>Kenny
>Akagi
>Akane Kurashiki
>Weenis
>Pinyo Enjoyer

And many others I have kept tabs on for a long time. Did you really believe I would forgive or forget? I didn't. I kept tabs, wallets, usernames and infiltrated groups you thought were private. Pretended to look away and ignore when you were involved in shady rugs, pretended to help you covert your tracks. Pretended to be your friend to collect personal info on you.

You fucking subhuman scammer trash. All of you will pay.

>>57757295
Part 2 of 2:

That's of course using the estimation that the loss in BTC's "mooning strength" or "X-ing ability" this time around is 5.5, which is an estimate based on the previous times when BTC's loss was "5.3", "5", and "6" in chronological order. If this time around the loss is 6 (the highest which has occurred so far), then using 21 we get 3.5 and applying a 3.5 X-ing to 15.5 gives us 54.25. So $54250. If this time around the loss is 5 (the lowest which has occurred so far), then using 21 we get 4.2 and applying a 4.2 X-ing to 15.5 gives us 65.1. So $65100.

However to get a fairer and more honest middle estimate (the 5.5 number), the "120 / 20" aspect (of the May 2021 calculation) should also be recalculated using 21. Using 21 we get 5.714 instead of 6. This means the range is 5 to 5.714, not 5 to 6. The middle between 5 and 5.714 is 5.357. Recalculating again using "5.357" (instead of 5.5) from 21, instead of 3.82 we get 3.92. Applying a 3.92 X-ing to 15.5 gives us 60.76 as opposed to 59.21. So $60760 instead of $59210. If this time around the loss in "mooning strength" or "X-ing ability" is the exact same as the previous time, that is a "5.714" loss from 21, then we get the number 3.675. Applying 3.675 to 15.5 gives us 56.9625. So $57k. As you can see, the differences are small.

Naturally this time around the loss may be slightly more than 5.714 or slightly lower than 5. Considering the current BTCUSD market and the current situation with the S&P 500 (which looks pretty dumpy) and the USDT Dominance chart (zoomed out it looks like it bottomed and is going up), then it looks more likely the loss this time around is greater than 5.714 rather than lower than 5. Or closer to being 5.714 than being 5. So it seems BTC is either a few k away from topping or is topping right about where it is now.

>>57748221
Part 2 of 2:

That's of course using the estimation that the loss in BTC's "mooning strength" or "X-ing ability" this time around is 5.5, which is an estimate based on the previous times when BTC's loss was "5.3", "5", and "6" in chronological order. If this time around the loss is 6 (the highest which has occurred so far), then using 21 we get 3.5 and applying a 3.5 X-ing to 15.5k gives us 54.25. So $54250. If this time around the loss is 5 (the lowest which has occurred so far), then using 21 we get 4.2 and applying a 4.2 X-ing to 15.5k gives us 65.1. So $65100.

However to get a fairer and more honest middle estimate (the 5.5 number), the "120 / 20" aspect (of the May 2021 calculation) should also be recalculated using 21. Using 21 we get 5.714 instead of 6. This means the range is 5 to 5.714, not 5 to 6. The middle between 5 and 5.714 is 5.357. Recalculating again using "5.357" (instead of 5.5) from 21, instead of 3.82 we get 3.92. Applying a 3.92 X-ing to 15.5k gives us 60.76 as opposed to 59.21. So $60760 instead of $59210. If this time around the loss in "mooning strength" or "X-ing ability" is the exact same as the previous time, that is a "5.714" loss from 21, then we get the number 3.675. Applying 3.675 to 15.5k gives us 56.9625. So $57k. As you can see, the differences are small.

Naturally this time around the loss may be slightly more than 5.714 or slightly lower than 5. Considering the current BTCUSD market and the current situation with the S&P 500 (which looks pretty dumpy) and the USDT Dominance chart (zoomed out it looks like it bottomed and is going up), then it looks more likely the loss this time around is greater than 5.714 rather than lower than 5. Or closer to being 5.714 than being 5. So it seems BTC is either a few k away from topping or is topping right about where it is now.

>>57743625
Part 2 of 2:

That's of course using the estimation that the loss in BTC's "mooning strength" or "X-ing ability" this time around is 5.5, which is an estimate based on the previous times when BTC's loss was "5.3", "5", and "6" in chronological order. If this time around the loss is 6 (the highest which has occurred so far), then using 21 we get 3.5 and applying a 3.5 X-ing to 15.5k gives us 54.25. So $54250. If this time around the loss is 5 (the lowest which has occurred so far), then using 21 we get 4.2 and applying a 4.2 X-ing to 15.5k gives us 65.1. So $65100.

However to get a fairer and more honest middle estimate (the 5.5 number), the "120 / 20" aspect (of the May 2021 calculation) should also be recalculated using 21. Using 21 we get 5.714 instead of 6. This means the range is 5 to 5.714, not 5 to 6. The middle between 5 and 5.714 is 5.357. Recalculating again using "5.357" (instead of 5.5) from 21, instead of 3.82 we get 3.92. Applying a 3.92 X-ing to 15.5k gives us 60.76 as opposed to 59.21. So $60760 instead of $59210. If this time around the loss in "mooning strength" or "X-ing ability" is the exact same as the previous time, that is a "5.714" loss from 21), then we get the number 3.675. Applying 3.675 to 15.5k gives us 56.9625. So $57k. As you can see, the differences are small.

Naturally this time around the loss may be slightly more than 5.714 or slightly lower than 5. Considering the current BTCUSD market and the current situation with the S&P 500 (which looks pretty dumpy) and the USDT Dominance chart (zoomed out it looks like it bottomed and is going up), then it looks more likely the loss this time around is greater than 5.714 rather than lower than 5. Or closer to being 5.714 than being 5. So it seems BTC is either a few k away from topping or is topping right about where it is now.

>>57738482
Part 2 of 2:

That's of course using the estimation that the loss in BTC's "mooning strength" or "X-ing ability" this time around is 5.5, which is an estimate based on the previous times when BTC's loss was "5.3", "5", and "6" in chronological order. If this time around the loss is 6 (the highest which has occurred so far), then using 21 we get 3.5 and applying a 3.5 X-ing to 15.5k gives us 54.25. So $54250. If this time around the loss is 5 (the lowest which has occurred so far), then using 21 we get 4.2 and applying a 4.2 X-ing to 15.5k gives us 65.1. So $65100.

However to get a fairer and more honest middle estimate (the 5.5 number), the "120 / 20" aspect (of the May 2021 calculation) should also be recalculated using 21. Using 21 we get 5.714 instead of 6. This means the range is 5 to 5.714, not 5 to 6. The middle between 5 and 5.714 is 5.357. Recalculating again using "5.357" (instead of 5.5) from 21, instead of 3.82 we get 3.92. Applying a 3.92 X-ing to 15.5k gives us 60.76 as opposed to 59.21. So $60760 instead of $59210. If this time around the loss in "mooning strength" or "X-ing ability" is the exact same as the previous time, that is a "5.714" loss from 21), then we get the number 3.675. Applying 3.675 to 15.5k gives us 56.9625. So $57k. As you can see, the differences are small.

Naturally this time around the loss may be slightly more than 5.714 or slightly lower than 5. Considering the current BTCUSD market and the current situation with the S&P 500 (which looks pretty dumpy) and the USDT Dominance chart (zoomed out it looks like it bottomed and is going up), then it looks more likely the loss this time around is greater than 5.714 rather than lower than 5. Or closer to being 5.714 than being 5. So it seems BTC is either a few k away from topping or is topping right about where it is now.

There are many, actually.

>>57482035
Amazon is like the American version of Temu. It ain't going anywhere :)

>>57426566
A giant fucking hole mysteriously appears in the land of 4chan, and it looks like something came the fuck out of it. First anons start disappearing and then a power pole gets mysteriously knocked down. The jannies send a line crew to fix it and they will disappear. The jannies will send someone out to investigate and they will find the wrecked utility truck and see bloody smears but no body.

Then an anon named Wojak comes because he began picking up strange radioactive signals with seismic activity. While he is at the scene of the utility workers death he notices a strange fat greasy substance that emits low level radiation that has never before been seen. His smart scientist friend Apu created a tracking device that sniffs for this particular radioactive element. Meanwhile the fat begins showing up at areas that have somehow been horribly destroyed, but no one ever notices the fat until after it happened.

They create a big map of the occurrences and it looks like it's heading towards /biz/. Within a few minutes his scientist friend Apu says let's deploy this truck load of sensors that we have, in a line across its path and quickly hook them up to this computer software that will track their signals on our occurrence map.

While all of this is going on the jannies are talking amongst themselves saying it must be a dirty /biz/ trick by a Bobo to destroy 4chan. They say if it reaches the state of /biz/ they will trap it there and ban everyone there.

In the meantime the signals on the fucking map have been going off like crazy. Wojak sees a pattern and goes to head whatever the fuck it is off.

I should buy CSU
>PER 96.85

>>56656103
Their subjects are distinctly different.
OPs subject is a question, a question within quotation marks as it's a question many are now asking themselves. Many people are shocked, confused and scared now. So it's a perfectly appropriate question to use as subject.
Whereas in stark contrast that thread he linked is of a guy using the all-caps "ALERT!!!!!!!!!"-style posting, without any question being asked, ie:
https://archived.moe/biz/search/subject/super%20alert/type/op/
https://archived.moe/biz/search/subject/major%20alert/type/op/

>>56481517
You are dumb in the head, OP. You can't be 8 or 9 in your early 20s. If you're in your early 20s then you're 20, 21, 22, 23 or maybe arguably 24.

>>56455911
You keep it a secret, fool. My brother-in-law has lost a big bag on crypto, and my sister doesn't even know about it.

A giant fucking hole mysteriously appears in the land of 4chan, and it looks like something came the fuck out of it. First anons start disappearing and then a power pole gets mysteriously knocked down. The jannies send a line crew to fix it and they will disappear. The jannies will send someone out to investigate and they will find the wrecked utility truck and see bloody smears but no body.

Then an anon named Wojak comes because he began picking up strange radioactive signals with seismic activity. While he is at the scene of the utility workers death he notices a strange fat greasy substance that emits low level radiation that has never before been seen. His smart scientist friend Apu created a tracking device that sniffs for this particular radioactive element. Meanwhile the fat begins showing up at areas that have somehow been horribly destroyed, but no one ever notices the fat until after it happened.

They create a big map of the occurrences and it looks like it's heading towards /biz/. Within a few minutes his scientist friend Apu says let's deploy this truck load of sensors that we have, in a line across its path and quickly hook them up to this computer software that will track their signals on our occurrence map.

While all of this is going on the jannies are talking amongst themselves saying it must be a dirty /biz/ trick by a Bobo to destroy 4chan. They say if it reaches the state of /biz/ they will trap it there and ban everyone there.

In the meantime the signals on the fucking map have been going off like crazy. Wojak sees a pattern and goes to head whatever the fuck it is off.

>>56165259
The reddit post predates that by several years and its resolution is higher. The source is reddit.

>>56031669
Looks like it's going sub 10k. Like /biz/ has been saying for years now.

A giant fucking hole mysteriously appears in the land of 4chan, and it looks like something came the fuck out of it. First anons start disappearing and then a power pole gets mysteriously knocked down. The jannies send a line crew to fix it and they will disappear. The jannies will send someone out to investigate and they will find the wrecked utility truck and see bloody smears but no body.

Then an anon named Wojak comes because he began picking up strange radioactive signals with seismic activity. While he is at the scene of the utility workers death he notices a strange fat greasy substance that emits low level radiation that has never before been seen. His smart scientist friend Apu created a tracking device that sniffs for this particular radioactive element. Meanwhile the fat begins showing up at areas that have somehow been horribly destroyed, but no one ever notices the fat until after it happened.

They create a big map of the occurrences and it looks like it's heading towards /biz/. Within a few minutes his scientist friend Apu says let's deploy this truck load of sensors that we have, in a line across its path and quickly hook them up to this computer software that will track their signals on our occurrence map.

While all of this is going on the jannies are talking amongst themselves saying it must be a dirty /biz/ trick by a Bobo to destroy 4chan. They say if it reaches the state of /biz/ they will trap it there and ban everyone there.

In the meantime the signals on the fucking map have been going off like crazy. Wojak sees a pattern and goes to head whatever the fuck it is off.

>>55935222
its heavily fudded because imagine 80% of /biz/ trying to shill you a dying shitcoin that is 90% down and its only usecase is creating pensions for HR roasties

Seriously, much appreciated for the helpful replies

>>55636708
How much money do you think I would need to invest in the companies you mentioned (Pepsi, Costco, Amazon, Microsoft, Exxon) to start ticking me over nicely and how long for?

>>55636763
>>55636773
>>55636783
Brilliant. This really helps be visualize what to expect when having shares in a company.

Also for the longest time I never thought to separate stocks and shares, I always used to treat them as the same entity. So if you want a dividend, buy company shares, if you want to own and then sell a product later, buy stocks.

>>55579220
"Could," not "will"

>>55369237
Also, he, ID 6IbeKH3b, is either the same faggot as this faggot >>55364890 ( bttIF3Q/ ) and changed his IP, or they're both simply paid shills operating on the same instructions following some guide book (which perfectly explains why he supported ID bttIF3Q/ and posted the same narrative and why he felt so vulnerable and exposed after being called JlDF):
First see: >>55364890
> "space"
Secondly see: >>55368470
> "crapto"
Now check this: >>/biz/thread/55328224#p55328465 – both "space" and "crapto" and the post even lacks punctuation at the end.

Also see how he adds echoes just to try to fit in: >>55364965 same as here: >>/biz/thread/55368468#p55368474 – notice the lack of end-of-text punctuation there as well.

>>55335324
> "an indicator that is as good as reading your diarrhea"
>>55335411
> ">because it works once it will always work"
> ">Because it just will OkAy"
> "just autistic pattern recognition attempts"
> "midwit"
You seem confused and angry (curiously anger seems to always accompany confused anons complaining about SRSI).

SRSI always "works" because it's simply a graphical representation of the market itself: it's based entirely on BTC's price action as manifested by the market. It's not based on opinion or feelings. It's not "TA" or some triangle pattern or line drawn by a guy. The market isn't looking at the SRSI and reacting to it, nor is the SRSI "causing" the market to do anything, rather the SRSI is the market – you're looking at the market when you're looking at the SRSI. That's why it always "works" – because the market itself is never wrong nor right; it simply is what it is. Whenever the SRSI appears to "not work" it's because anon isn't looking at it correctly or he's using the SRSI on a for-that-moment inappropriate timescale while ignoring the other timescales (for example 1H is bearish so he shorts but the other timescales are bullish = he gets himself rekt, then thinks SRSI is bad and evil and cries about it on /biz/).

>>55335411
> ">because it works once"
Archives are full of countless instances of anons using SRSI correctly ending up being correct over and over again.

For instance, at ~25200 this anon used the 4H to know a pump was imminent: https://archive.is/AYE0n
> "The 4H SRSI just bottomed and has begun rising. So expect some small pumpage from here."
And then the price rose to ~26800.

Another instance being on April 22nd at ~27200 when anon warned of a pump due to the 1D being bottomed: https://archive.is/QVje8
> "Dump's over for now Bobros, check the 1D SRSI."
And over it was, price it rose to ~29850, dipped a bit then rose back to ~29850 then fell on May 6th when the 1D SRSI and simultaneously the 4H turned bearish and fell.

sirs what are some good tgs to find ETH gems?

>>54752943
Pepe would have died a natural death, the cycle of all memes, when he began to be co-opted by normies and thus became "uncool"

However, a vital intervention disrupted this process, namely, Hilary Clinton's designation of said frog as a "white supremacist" hate symbol, thus making him cool again, and throwing him back towards the clutches of the Internet Hate Machine, making him edgy and thus cool again.