/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57558067
so basically the future looks something like this:
>setup your own customized Blockchain VM in a matter of seconds no matter what kinda business you run (see the webm)
>no need to make huge investments upfront instead pay as you go
>nocode deployments so you dont need to hire Blockchain engineers
>as soon as your Subnet is set up its pretty much connected to any Chainlink Oracle
>tokenize your assets without having to deal with the underlying tech shit

To run these Subnets the AVAX token has to be staked and AVAX is hardcapped and deflationary. So if this happens >>57557801 as projected then price will go up and same goes for Chainlink as literally any Asset needs that offchain Data.

>>57033025
>50 dollars for gas fees
only on the C-Chain, other Subnets have their own Fee markets and are not affected by the inscription spam.
>I gave with avax gas rise due to ordinals
Subnets solve this as already explained.
>okay avax solved the problem of forking another chain besides eth.
hm what should I do as a Business? hire 50 blockchain engineers, cryptographers, learn to code and pay millions of dollars and wait 2 years? or do I click 5 buttons and deploy my own custom Blockchain in under a minute?
If you still cant figure this out, you are probably retarded or some shit.

>>56805871
Source is the Boston Consulting Group
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Consulting_Group
and this study is often cited by the World Economic Forum and others. if you read the pic you can see it.
>like AVAX is somehow connected
check the links, read them >>56805828

All RWAs will be tokenized on Subnets. pic related, no code deployment of a custom VM in under a minute.
This is what the EEA actually wanted. Subnets is the Endgame.
(to run Subnets they have to stake and use AVAX).

>>56769530
>And they will make their own.
yes as a Subnet, it takes less than a minute to set up your own custom virtual machine without knowing any code.
No need to hire Blockchain engineers or wait 12+ months. Now anyone can have their own Blockchain, literally any Business in any Industry starting with the financial industry will have a Subnet.

>>56716815
What about the Avalanche Network effect?
>>56717087
>is not as good as SOL
haha good joke:
>downtimes because centralized and you cant run your own validator
>faked their TVL
>the jewish rat Sam Bankman Fraud involved in it
Solana is inferior garbage and a scam

>subnets add too much complexity
you can deploy a Subnet in under 30 seconds on Avalanche, its a no code deployment even a monkey could do it.

>>56684894
No other blockchain is as cost-efficient and technologically superior as picrel

>>56661138
Every AVAX mention in this board gets insta-raided by jeets hired by "competing" """DeFi Platforms""" to be here 24/7, these platforms essentially became vaporware after Avalanche came through, so they've been running FUD campaigns since then (with little to no success so far)
Avalanche is set to become the DeFi Hub as its technological fundamentals are unparalleled (i.e. unique consensus mechanism practically resolving the blockchain trilemma) and its biz-dev approach has given it the edge when it comes to institutional adoption (Avalance's vision is to offer blockchain as a service, where you can onboard crypto in under 2 minutes without a single line of code, picrel)
Avalanche took out of the way every hurdle in the way for mainstream adoption, now it's just a matter of time until liquidity flows in and the ecosystem gets properly valued. If we take into account RWA Tokenization, every AVAX should be (in the most conservative scenario) 4-digits under the next decade
>inb4 "muhh validating would become too expensive"
the amount needed to validate the network/ is set to decrease, it's only a matter of when.
>inb4 price action
AVAX has always been a long-term hodl

>>56395860
Never forget you can set up an Avalanche subnet in under 2 mins without a single line of code

>>56342268
here's picrel on how fast is to set up a subnet on Avalanche. Lost my train of thought watching Poomar posting the exact same pic twice kek
Institutions already know this, and they're already catching up fairly quickly, hence when Avalanche's ecosystem gets properly priced in it's completely over if you didn't manage to get a decent stack already.
You're braindead if you fail to see this, but it wouldn't be surprising considering the amount of pajeetery and newfags on /biz/ these days.

>setting a subnet with Avacloud takes less than 5 minutes without a single line of code
>massively useful for both boomer institutions and devs of all levels
Tokenization of Real World Assets (RWA) is a 16 to 68 trillion market that has yet to be priced in throughout the next decade.

>>56305230
I mean if Avalanche Subnets are the Shovels, then Chainlinks CCIP is the rails and minecarts to move the tokenized assets around and turn it into actual value.
ideally you own and stake both already.
For newfags (financially speaking) AVAX makes more sense because the staking is open for anyone while the LINK staking is still limited.
AVAX also has a higher APY right now, so you could stake AVAX and use the Staking rewards to accumulate LINK. The winning move looks something like that.
>>56305246
>got officially partnered
Its not about simple partnerships, its about running Subnets.
Basically everyone wants a Blockchain, literally every Bank wants their own Chain.
now they could hire 50 Blockchain Engineer autismos, spend 1.5 Million dollars and over a year for implementation or they can launch a Subnet with a custom EVM in under a Minute. They can even scale it up and decentralize it however they need it.
And most important: to run Subnets AVAX has to be staked.
>more Blockchains/Subnets launching = Less AVAX in circulation = Price goes up as AVAX is hardcapped and deflationary
>>56305510
isnt it already very obvious right now?
imo if someone still cant see it, there is no way they are higher than 70 IQ.
it takes profound mental retardation to ignore all the signs.

>this is how easy it is to launch a new Subnet
Avalanche already won.