[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.23711573 [View]
File: 82 KB, 728x827, 1599143450050.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23711573

>Futures

I just hope my BABA is ok
haha


ha

>> No.22323997 [View]
File: 82 KB, 728x827, 1599143450050.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22323997

Nobody seems to have any confidence in the US markets or economy left. And the big bois seem unwilling to give some help.

All very concerning.

>> No.22182507 [View]
File: 82 KB, 728x827, 1562902477846.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22182507

>>22182467
based

>> No.22168566 [View]
File: 82 KB, 728x827, 1599143450050.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22168566

IM GONNA BUY THE DIP

WITNESS ME

>> No.22166065 [View]
File: 82 KB, 728x827, 1562902477846.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22166065

reminder that racism is not allowed outside of /b/
also pump SPY buy the dip

>> No.578711 [View]
File: 75 KB, 728x827, the softest.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
578711

>>578675
For asset protection (my main concern), about holding companies. Is there a guide I could read about their setup / taxation / protection? Typing it all out here would be a bother for you, but I'd love to learn more.

You mentioned that it can protect "equipment". I'm sure that computer systems would fall under this. In that case a storage server could be the asset that contains all client and website information, thus being a specialized piece of business equipment with an easily determined dollar value based on physical parts.

Thoughts?

>>578687
>fraudulent conveyance
This sounds like it could be a problem...
What if the entity was just leasing the information / equipment from me personally?
It sounds like the defendant and its associates would have to display intent to deliver a lower dollar amount than the most ideal liquidation of its assets. If the company never had assets in the first place, just loan contracts for capital and equipment, would that still be a problem?

I'm not too worried about paying out based on physical assets, so much as I want to avoid their acquisition of the dependent services that the corp pays for.

The goal with this is, I want to protect my clients' websites and the contracts I have with them. No equipment necessarily even has to be involved. Are client work contracts considered assets?

(have to travel right now, I'll set up a burner email in a bit)

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]