/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20319180
Been holding for years, almost definitely more than you. You're a linklet. And a faggot. I'm sorry.

>>20319196
>That being said, nodes servicing multiple contracts will likely need to have a staked collateral equivalent to the cumulative amount of assets they underpin.
I often think about this aspect of things, i.e. the idea that a major layer enters the network so to speak and relies on the liquidity of the collateral in the first place and how that might present problems. I work for a large MNE who you'd know of as a holder given they've been working in the area and are named often in link-related news, and many firms like it could serve to benefit, however for huge value contracts I think there is a lot to work out first, and not just the usual FUD associated with smart contracts (i.e. difficulty with execs understanding them, programmers writing them, maintaining them, changes required to conditions which goes against the fundamental principle of immutability)