[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.1939485 [View]
File: 7 KB, 225x225, FB_IMG_1478617291746.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1939485

Stupid question:
I understand that stocks are stochastic,and truly it's all just gambling at the end of the day. I've been pissing around with a few of the memes here, and I notice a recurring pattern. Whenever I respond to speculation in rtg in a reactionary sense, I have exclusively bought high and got Shafted immediately after. If I didn't have an account with less than 200$ I would say shit is rigged, kek (joking, though I believe one could have that influence if you were a large enough portion of the volume).

Now, that being said, there's a few smaller energy stocks companies that I follow, and even some rtg memes that I notice have runs of what appear to be predictable (to the human eye. Which means nothing) very small swings over extended periods of time, say 1-3 weeks.

If one saw something like a $0.02 swing with 95% replicatibility over a period of like 2 weeks, why not set a limit buy on like, a standard deviation below the mean, then set a limit sell on the standard deviation above the mean. I understand shit can happen and that's still inherent risk but God damn, looking at a handful on stocks this looks literally too easy to do. The margins are much lower per share, but that should be expected with the (apparent?) Lower risk, right?

>>1939450
Yup. This is what I'm doing rn. Which also makes it fun to play with rtg memes.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]