[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.17893610 [View]
File: 69 KB, 622x600, F01A2C22-6E66-47E8-A6E9-38E5AA01C9E0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

>I’ve been following Q for years and I’m having a hard time finding conflict between your narrative and theirs. Just my observation over here.
By its very nature it’s difficult to discern who is really “Q”
Have a good repository of verified “Q” posts?

>> No.17132327 [View]
File: 69 KB, 622x600, 868E63D5-596D-48F2-837C-17D0139F745F.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

By not lying and being honest (but actually)

>> No.17012558 [View]
File: 69 KB, 622x600, 70CCA657-5EDB-42D2-A66D-3FD2EE2B0DEA.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]

Nice digits
PoW consensus algorithm mirrors the way in which quantum states decohere
Many “observers” come to a consensus via “observation operators” on the superposition of a quantum state
I’ll give you a good example:
“What’s the block that were hashing now”
“They call this block “2020”

In much the same way, only one viable block (aka one reality) collapses out of many possibilities (superpositions) during the process of mining

>> No.16955417 [View]
File: 69 KB, 622x600, 745E6DCD-B83D-4CE2-95E8-B1E67F21F026.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]


View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]