/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>54359901
>make crypto boards look like incel homosexuals
Kikes are trying to get the leftwing crowd in

Why is this board so antisemitic? If Jews control the financal markets, wouldn't you want to be friends with them so they help you instead of hinder you?

>>50010717

>>49968053
With Jews you win.

Based, thanks kike

>>49661453
Dont be a chud anon, jews are your greatest ally.

>>26138909
With Jews You Win!

>>25768908
In china you are required to pay for the person whom your injure medical care for the reminder of their life. So if you hit someone you must ensure they are dead. Running over someone and killing them will only cost a few years and a payment for funeral. Running someone over and them surviving will have you in a lifetime of debt.

>>23793187
0x1F5afb5C491881B391ed145D3Ade814CC57F1b4a

>>23643403
Stonks only go up!!! BRRRR

>>23068226
ok sure

Holy shit are the Jews going to keep DOOMPING?
At this rate I’ll be able to afford another kilo bar.

>>22485557
I don't even know who that is but he looks jewish so yes

Gotta admire how the merchants are engineering just enough pullbacks that most pension funds, institutional investors, and the little guy mostly stay out of the metal markets for now. They just keep them piling into cryptos and equities like pigs in shit. “Ohhh no line went down (even if only a little and for one or two days) in PMs this is unacceptably risky I can’t invest my money in this bullshit buy more Tesla”

It’s like they’re keeping our shit going up only gradually, over the medium term, just for us.

why yes

>>21728521
they're either doing an awfully shit job at it (pic related lol), or the narrative that free markets (in which anyone who knows how to code and can collaborate with others to build new things can offer alternatives to anything) = jewish tricks is demonstrably wrong
one could be the single greatest manipulator of society on the planet—it's damned hard to argue with, let alone try to pilpul open-source code that is enforced by the very laws of nature
having a stake in the existing system with which you can attempt to control the code can only go so far; code that refers to nature in order to reward network participants will cause wealth to concentrate in the hands of those who reinvest wealth into the nature-referencing processes that all applicable cryptos participate in
because wealth is derived from nature, these wind up being the most valuable cryptos

fundamentally speaking, jews cannot hope to control crypto if they are to remain as the kind of socially manipulative, subversive jews that we know
this is a real paradigm shift; we have, at our hands, a multitude of different cryptocurrencies that reward desirable behaviors which build wealth. these cryptos are rewarding a majority of people who earn and are capable of earning wealth, and punishing a majority of people who forcibly manipulate wealth out of the control of earners so that they may control wealth
pretty incredible, compared to how things were on a fundamental level ten or twenty years ago
the internet was NOT "supposed" to do this—but alas, nature wouldn't have it any other way
subversive people don't understand how nature works

How is this a bad thing

>>21350953
>If you always liked conspiracies you have to love xrp
Yeah, it sure was fun at first. But later all these shizos can say is
>DYOR 2000 YOE
Thats all. No proofs, just a bunch of retarted shills. Maybe the real conspiracy here is that people are getting pain in XRP to shill here.

>>21351198
More like missing on link after i had intention to buy it. I just saw some info on pol and started reading shit like melon threads.

>>21351261
I tried to win with jews.

>>21187580
The BNT token is crucial to all the Bancor AMM's (automated market makers) as it by design makes up 50% of each liquidity pool on the network. Why is that important? Market participants will be incentivised to stake their long hold token of choice in Bancor V2 liquidity pools due to getting no impermanent losses from staking and having the advantage of single token exposure, while earning trading fees as liquidity providers at the expense of traders executing trades. So if the value of the other tokens in the liquidity pools increases, the BNT proportional value has to increase as well to balance the pool. How will this happen? From BNT stakers getting more favourable dynamic fees if the pool is unbalanced. This creates more market incentive for people to buy additional BNT to 'arbitrage' the fee imbalance from the pools - price of BNT goes up.

Another important factor: the BNT supply will be inflated as BNT staking rewards will be given from minting new supply, which amplifies the potential earnings from staking BNT in addition to making profit from trading fees. If you're not staking your BNT, you will be diluted out of your market share %, so there's a game theoretical design for every holder to stake their BNT, which creates the following loop: the more BNT staked > the better the liquidity for traders > less slippage for traders > more volume > more fee earnings for liquidity providers > more demand for BNT > price of BNT goes up > deeper liquidity pools > less slippage > more volume > more fees > more demand for BNT > BNT price goes up and the loop goes on and on until all digital assets are being traded on Bancor or outsourced from Bancor liquidity pools.

That's what's called the 'liquidity black hole'. If that loop gets successfully implemented, there's no ceiling to how much BNT could pump.

>>21112767
>Bear with me, I'm sure i could find some copypasta about this but i'm going to type it up live right now because i'm so fucking excited.

The BNT token is crucial to all the Bancor AMM's (automated market makers) as it by design makes up 50% of each liquidity pool on the network. Why is that important? Market participants will be incentivised to stake their long hold token of choice in Bancor V2 liquidity pools due to getting no impermanent losses from staking and having the advantage of single token exposure, while earning trading fees as liquidity providers at the expense of traders executing trades. So if the value of the other tokens in the liquidity pools increases, the BNT proportional value has to increase as well to balance the pool. How will this happen? From BNT stakers getting more favourable dynamic fees if the pool is unbalanced. This creates more market incentive for people to buy additional BNT to 'arbitrage' the fee imbalance from the pools - price of BNT goes up.

Another important factor: the BNT supply will be inflated as BNT staking rewards will be given from minting new supply, which amplifies the potential earnings from staking BNT in addition to making profit from trading fees. If you're not staking your BNT, you will be diluted out of your market share %, so there's a game theoretical design for every holder to stake their BNT, which creates the following loop: the more BNT staked > the better the liquidity for traders > less slippage for traders > more volume > more fee earnings for liquidity providers > more demand for BNT > price of BNT goes up > deeper liquidity pools > less slippage > more volume > more fees > more demand for BNT > BNT price goes up and the loop goes on and on until all digital assets are being traded on Bancor or outsourced from Bancor liquidity pools.

That's what's called the 'liquidity black hole'. If that loop gets successfully implemented, there's no ceiling to how much BNT could pump.

>>21108675
The BNT token is crucial to all the Bancor AMM's (automated market makers) as it by design makes up 50% of each liquidity pool on the network. Why is that important? Market participants will be incentivised to stake their long hold token of choice in Bancor V2 liquidity pools due to getting no impermanent losses from staking and having the advantage of single token exposure, while earning trading fees as liquidity providers at the expense of traders executing trades. So if the value of the other tokens in the liquidity pools increases, the BNT proportional value has to increase as well to balance the pool. How will this happen? From BNT stakers getting more favourable dynamic fees if the pool is unbalanced. This creates more market incentive for people to buy additional BNT to 'arbitrage' the fee imbalance from the pools - price of BNT goes up.

Another important factor: the BNT supply will be inflated as BNT staking rewards will be given from minting new supply, which amplifies the potential earnings from staking BNT in addition to making profit from trading fees. If you're not staking your BNT, you will be diluted out of your market share %, so there's a game theoretical design for every holder to stake their BNT, which creates the following loop: the more BNT staked > the better the liquidity for traders > less slippage for traders > more volume > more fee earnings for liquidity providers > more demand for BNT > price of BNT goes up > deeper liquidity pools > less slippage > more volume > more fees > more demand for BNT > BNT price goes up and the loop goes on and on until all digital assets are being traded on Bancor or outsourced from Bancor liquidity pools.

That's what's called the 'liquidity black hole'. If that loop gets successfully implemented, there's no ceiling to how much BNT could pump.

>>21046835

>>20935911
Based merchants, always ready to keep PM prices rising only slowly in a way that avoids too much public attention, so /pmg/ stacklets rather than normies watching cable business news shows can gradually buy them up

>>20836057
Based merchants giving us stacklets a little more time before the moon really starts