/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>28987718

Correct. LINK pays those literal who "partners" in either STINK tokens or cash and they sign up to issue a few press releases praising the services and feigning some sort of activity.

Meanwhile, the principle business activity of Chainlink, just like XRP, has been printing and dumping billions of worthless tokens on unsavvy retail investors with no legal strings attached.

>>22000691

Do the math.

>>21998041

The DEFI ecosystem find the Chainlink model with a high level of centralization, corrupt token distribution, seedy ICO from the 2017 era that everyone wants to forget, all very distasteful.

Plus their fees are untenable and high. Tellor is a formidable opponent.

>>21825560
>literally zero projects are using tellor.

Stay retarded.

>>21785053

Tellor is already winning the oracle war on a value and cost basis.

>>21681754
>The only oracle coins that matter are LINK

That's where you fucked up. TRB almost has as many users at a fraction of the cost and market cap.

>>21606339

This is worth almost half of what LINK is worth.

>>21552359

Tellor TRB is already one of the best performing cyrpto assets in 2020.

If it assumes just a fraction of LINK's bloated marketcap, we're gonna be looking at $3,000 per token, and it's already got nearly as many users.

Plus no scammy ICO, racially White developers, no massive early whales, it's currently seriously undervalued and one of the surest 100x available today.

/biz/ will start developing an interest in Tellor at around $500 each.

Once it hits $1,000 token at the start of 2020, they will begin FUDing it, and then when it hits $3,000 at the end of 2021, they will buy.

>>21463610
>This is just a minor feature of a large list of shit Link can do.

Well, it's basically failing as a fee-based secure API feed.

What else can it do?

>>21440015
>LINK replacement?

That would be Tellor. Still sub-100 million MC, so a strong buy.

>>21443964

You don't have to read LINKlet, pictures alone tell the story.

Pic related.