/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20325687
Accumulation time is over. But if you want to swing for 10% gains, possibly missing out on the next pump and losing all the gains, go ahead.

>>18397708
Yes, companies are spending $144,000 during a quarantine when 90% of their clients are closed and not operating, such as NYENRODE University, Douwes Fine Art, and JWC Superyachts. And the oil companies are flourishing.

>>18144774
>Vitamin C for coronavirus
lol

The Dutch got scammed. Not only did they ruin their reputation by unlocking tokens, not only are they determined to sell tokens to pay advisors and early investors, they also got absolutely, without a doubt, chinked.

Back to Chuck E Cheese posting, bros.

I confess. I fudded only to troll, while keeping my eye on the project and to buy in lower when the signs were there. Thank you for the discount.

I said on December 21st that you have 45 days to sell before you will get anally annihilated: >>/biz/thread/S16627530

I was only four days off. I guess I got BTFO.

>>17095134
>Developed and planned for release Q4 2019
Exactly, VIDTard. Two years in development and counting. Where's the release announcement?

AmSpec has been a client since Q2 2019 and nearly 30 clients back even in Q1 2019. V-ID has announced ONE single client since Q4 2019 and that was a photographer validating his personal photos. Meaning 99% of the clients did not use the self-validation. Unless you can show me a screenshot of the self validation dashboard, it does not exist.

Bagholder BTFO.

>>16848988
>>16849330
>Ever noticed the schizo Fudster Pajeet doesn't post as much during the daytime? It's because it's nighttime in New Delhi.
I was around almost all day yesterday, Raynesh. Fudding is fun, but now the FUD will be that I stop giving a shit. Good luck getting your threads bumped.

>>16839325
>I have made no such promises, and VIDT is my main holding. I have seen all I need to see with it to know this is an excellent project.
AKA you don't care if other anons lose money, you simply want a temporary pump to get out because you were too greedy to sell the top. If you were confident about the project, you wouldn't need to make threads for months and make up lies. You would buy, set, and look at the price once or twice a month. The fact that VIDT is your main holding means you cannot be trusted.

>>16808265
>trusted and works with are now the same?
100% of Fortune 1000 companies trust Acronis with their data. They're not working with Acronis, because they are a customer of Acronis. Is this the best argument you got for Goldman Sachs backing Acronis?

>>16758490
>Clearly you don't understand the implications of this and why companies choose to use VIDT.
Which companies have signed up with V-ID since June of 2019? We're waiting for the answer. In every thread. All we see is crickets and you retards making another thread the next day.

>>16712101
This must be the new bagholder tactic. Making word salad arguments. Or they are turning legit schizo. Beware anons or you will end up like them.

>>16654755
In fact, if you compare the numbers you can tell the ratio of validations are off and V-ID is lying.

I wanted to help you frens... Why didn't you listen... Why...

The V-ID dev team will abandon development by March of 2020 and all client acquisition will depend on Caltrix Consultancy and other third parties. This is the last stop before the dead stop.

Reminder: Caltrix's main operation includes being a third-party reseller of V-ID, trash collection and waste management, and managing home care for the elderly. I am not making this shit up.

>>16322672