/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>25762565
big if true.

>>22331996
Nah, it's not the time for rope. Not yet, at least. Even if I sound like I'm about to capitulate in my last post, it's just to vent a little. There's no reason to sell at a loss, not while they're still attempting to make this work. The moment you should definitely consider giving up is when the team and the investors all leave. We just have to wait, pray that the devs won't fuck over the previous holders regarding swapping for the new tokens, and shill the second version. If we're shrewd enough, we could even use this as an argument to tell how similar it is to STA, meaning it should experience similar levels of price action and hype due to the low marketcap.

There's still a light at the end of the tunnel.

>>21250676
>He fell for the meme FUD

>see thread telling people to buy chainlink
>report post for giving free money

>>21080581
For the last 9 months I've been stacking LINK and I've also been Jelqing a ton too. At work today, I hid in the bathroom three seperate times to check the price of LINK and Jelq. It's like the price of LINK and the frequency at which I Jelq are somehow correlated. Did anyone else get into Jelqing after adding Chainlink to their portfolio? By holding LINK I am literally compelled to Jelq, it's like I don't have a choice.

Sergey has been conducting some of the KYC zoom calls while on the toilet

>>20221376
Why do you avoid it and what do you recommend instead?

>>20189520
Explain.

>>20187403
I can't code or anything like that. I mostly just learn different kinds of software and use them to make money.

Eg. I made a ton of money from 2015-2018 editing peoples videos with Premiere Pro