/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58202343
Yes, but if we just put that aside and look at his position you could argue it's an important position which should be influencing the outcome. He has an important position, yet he doesn't do anything with it. If we fire Blaire and put someone who's competent in the same position then something could come out of it. But because Blaire is Blaire... you know the rest

>>57975175
>$25 is bearish tho.
Exactly, it's literally bearish, yet still AMAZING for me. Anything above 25$ is a god send. Which means I'm gonna get blessed this bull run.

>True. I'm mentally damaged and obsessing over your delusions. I'm gotta stop with long responses kek. You're making me type all this weird gay shit.
That's bad, you should go see a therapist

>Which will never be used for anything else than parties.
Not true, part of it has been already used

https://etherscan.io/address/0x21346283a31a5ad10fa64377e77a8900ac12d469#internaltx See here, they had 120k ETH, now only 37.2k ETH

>They did say "public workerpools" in 2021, which you claimed they didn't. Back then they made it sound like they would come out soon, which they didn't.
True, I forgot about that one. Oh well, we all make mistakes. I guess you're the obsessed one if you remember stuff from 3 years ago in such detail. Did RLC hurt you? I guess it must have if you're obsessed in trying to make me see the "light", when I'm just saying 25 buckerus would be nice, anything above that is ULTRA NICE. I'll be able to afford a few trips to other countries with that shit, while also buying a nice camera in order to photograph and record that shit. You did say yourself, 25$ is bearish, which means that it WILL hit 25$. I'm also 100% convinced it'll get to 25$ AT LEAST. That's literally my WORST PRICE prediction. Could literally go above 100$ though...

TLDR; 25$ is programmed in, just buy. Worker pools around the corner, Gilles CONFIRMED

>>57958030
Nope, for the worker pools! Get at least 100 RLC so you'll be able to provide work in the worker pools later this year. Even if you don't give a fuck about the project. If your computer is mostly idle than not providing computing power is kinda stupid

>>57941828
Most people have been cashed out HARD out of the make it stack... Used to cost 2610$ (if you say 1 RLC was 0.3$, which was the price for a long time)... But not it's 37410$, which is more than most people can risk to afford on here

>>57934370
>I like steady growth into something that holds its value over longer periods
If you mean holding the same value for MONTHS without moving 1 inch then sure, RLC is the right coin for you. The tripple top was just confirmed on BTC, therefore I'm pretty sure we're going back down to a stable 1$ my fren

>>57474506
Exactly, you still have time to buy before it's 3 - 4.5$. Where do you think this volume is going? Also, look at the volume on Revolut, there's another 80m-150m$ in volume coming from there...