[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.15965274 [View]
File: 33 KB, 500x261, 1513796479613.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15965274

>>15965103

>> No.15829995 [View]
File: 33 KB, 500x261, 1513796479613.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15829995

dont worry fren a x2 is nothing!
we will x100 from here!

>> No.15814620 [View]
File: 33 KB, 500x261, 1513796479613.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15814620

https://blog.chain.link/breaking-down-mixicles-and-its-potential-to-unlock-enterprise-demand-for-defi-applications-on-public-blockchains/

>Opening Up DeFi to Enterprises Adoption
By separating state changes from payment outcomes and using oracles to pass data confidentially between them, DeFi instruments on public blockchains become far more attractive to highly regulated enterprises with large capital allocations. In fact, DeFi instruments are a drop in the bucket compared to the potential capital sitting in traditional financial vehicles. With many scalability solutions in the pipeline, Chainlink is using oracles to solve the other two major problems inhibiting the development of enterprise smart contracts in finance on public blockchains: connectivity and privacy with audibility.

Mixicles are very close to being live on the Ethereum Mainnet (and other blockchains in the future) pending third-party security audits of the simple 188 lines of source code. Enterprise use of public blockchains are not some futuristic concept, but are a near-term reality, as novel approaches to privacy like Mixicles become a reality. These technologies provide the lightweight privacy and regulatory compliance needed for public blockchain use at a global scale.

>> No.14980170 [View]
File: 33 KB, 500x261, 1513796479613.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14980170

>>14979785
dis

>> No.14979853 [View]
File: 33 KB, 500x261, 1513796479613.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979853

just think for a second, once threshold signatures are deployed and staking + reputation is live, anyone could run a node, and contrary to what most think, you won't need KYC to run a node. KYC is required to be listed on the official chainlink website, but once third parties like linkpool or other reputation providers will go live, nothing prevents them from listing anonymus nodes. the real question would be, what sane business would include in his smart contract node selection, nodes that are anonymous; But that's another question.

once links are staked on a chainlink node, the node operator will have to make sure that his node never goes offline, otherwise his node will keep being selected by smart contracts and will be queried, resulting in a no answer, which will wreck the reputation of the node and make the node lose its staked links for as long as the node is offline.

staked links can also be used as collateral by multiple on chain smart contracts so once a node operator stakes his links, they are basically locked FORVER or as long as all the smart contracts that use the node are online which could be a very long time.

now that you have this info in mind, think for a second.
how many nodes with 10k links can there be? the staked links will be locked forever out of the circulating supply.

if we take the current circulating supply and divide it by 10k links, we get 35k nodes.

now imagine this for a second, sergey is saying the network, in the long term will have approx 19k nodes running.
if each of those 19k nodes stakes 10k links, this will imply that 190 000 000 links will be locked long term which represents 54% of the circulating supply.
now Facebook is asking for 10 million dollars to become a node operator on libra, right now 10 million dollar is approx. 4 million links.

how many nodes can run with 4 million links with the current circulating supply? 87 nodes

.Chainlink 1000$ is LITERALLY FUD at this point

>> No.14866957 [View]
File: 33 KB, 500x261, 1562014774164.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14866957

>> No.14556350 [View]
File: 33 KB, 500x261, 1513827837997.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14556350

>>14555955
Bless

>> No.14513444 [View]
File: 33 KB, 500x261, 1513796479613.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14513444

LINK #1

check'em

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]