/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20589507
>A dividend stock should be considered a stock specifically bought because of the dividend, not any stock with a dividend.
You might as well say growth stocks are good and value stocks are bad. That’s been the view of the market for 10+ years, and the trend is you friend until a recession hits and weak balance sheets are exposed. But the fed kept that from happening.

Maybe just start you own “DIVIDENDS BAD GENERAL” instead of having this argument all the time?

>>20589392
She’s an anal devil you know.
But like a good catholic girl, she’s saving the cunny for marriage.

>>19582728
Don’t listen to that idiot, beer is bread soda. Everyone knows that.
How many KO shares you got? I regret massively selling all my KO calls on Friday, especially selling them so early.