/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16218753
https://youtu.be/IOlvOiGPPio

>>12000906

>a bunch of clips you've found and cut together

What is cinema?

>>11780014

Timing models; one vote per CPU. This is a republic; it is not a demagoguery. It is not where people get to yell and scream and lie. And very soon we're going to change that narrative. Very soon people are going to discover that when you start lying and when you troll, there are consequences.

So. What is a node? A node is not every little tiny Raspberry Pi running everywhere. The machines running Bitcoin in 2009 were bigger than every single Raspberry Pi. The machines Hal [Finney] ran. The machines Bear [Ray Dillinger] ran. Everyone else who joined this thing at that point had bigger machines running these damn things [sic]. And now we have this idea that we can't run it on a little tiny insy winsy insignificant machine.

Who cares? What is more important: you having a copy of the block chain, or you having money that no one can manipulate. Honestly, start thinking. These whole utopian ideas of how you spend money are wrong.

The processes that can enable the creation and release of actuarially sound threatrisk
models that incorporate heterogeneous tendencies in variance across
multidimensional determinants while maintaining parsimony already exist in
rudimentary form. Extending these though a combination of Heteroscedastic predictors
(GARCH/ARIMA etc) coupled with non-parametric survival models will make these
tools more robust. The expenditure of further effort in the creation of models where the
underlying hazard rate (rather than survival time) is a function of the independent
variables (covariates) provides opportunities for the development of quantitative
systems that aid in the development of derivative and insurance products designed to
spread risk.
In spreading the risk from outlier or black swan events, organizations can
concentrate their efforts into obtaining the best return from their scarce resources.
There are far more bunyips than black swans. If we expend excessive resources
looking for bunyips and black swans, we will find these from time to time but we will
then miss the white swans. Focus on outlier risk incidents is unlikely to decrease the
risk faced by an organization in mitigating the black swan event whether a
consequence of a zero-day vulnerability, or a new form of attack. This approach will
divert resources away from known risks and make these more likely. This lowers the
level of security applied to an organization whist still doing nothing to remove the
discovery of an unexpected platypus from time to time. Conversely, good security
practice, which leads to the minimization of risk through stopping known events,
makes black swans incidents less likely. Good risk and security practice as expressed
against known issues also minimizes the impact of zero-day and other outlier incidents.

>>11608689

it doesn't matter what he thinks.

hash power matters. that's it.

if you want a voice in this system, compete.

not with your voice, or your political bullshit.

compete, or die. that's it.