/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>25743372
And so slowly we will see more crumbs for the companies in pic related come into existence, right?

What projects are also working on decentralized oracles?
i know chainlink is the king
i'd like to know just to give a reading about

I feel like this chainlink shit is just gonna ATH at like 1.60 cents and dump right after main-net and it is never heard of again. I think that was it.

Maybe I should sell before its just one big JUST afterwards.

Anons, idk what to do, should I buy more linkies or just hodl the current ones I have?

how high can link reach in the bull run?
is $20 realistically?
And about req?
t.linklet 4k

can i expect $10 chainlink eoy 2020 or is it really that hard?

Only once will I post this. Only once.

Those of you who have been blindly following the chainlink shills are absolute fucking retards. If you had an IQ above 90 and spent 30 minutes researching, you'd actually understand why you are making the worst investment of your lives.

The problem with this board is literally most of the Chainlink shills could not explain to you why Chainlink is actually an amazing shitcoin. The few anons that do get it's a scam and post legitimately useful information get ignored because most of this board is dense and dumb as fuck and when they can't understand something is a scam they act like it wasn't even posted.

Chainlink is next gen ponzi. It will make all current holders with 10k+ bankrupt. You may have to wait 2-3 years, which most of you will be too dumb to do. You'll see a decrease a year from now and because you've been checking the price every fucking day for over 1500 days you'll think "fuck it, I'm selling, this isn't going anywhere!". When the token actually goes to zero you'll be holding the keys to your piece of shit Pontiac and those of us who weren't total brainlets and didnt buy will be having you park our Bentley's because you work as a fucking valet now.

This is not pasta. Do not repost this. This is simply the truth. Fucking screencap and check back in 2021. You know I'm right, I always am.

>Be poorfag with 4k LINK stack
>1K EOY Happens
>Now have a decent amount of capital
>Cash out half
>Invest other half into microcap

What's wrong with my plan /biz/?

Im convinced now, i had to buy my suicide insurance of 1k Linkies now even tough it hurts... I almost did it at 19cents. What other suicide insurances do you have?
Mine is 1 BTC, 4ETH and now linkies.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

I don't understand why only high iq autists understand chainlink. Only us will have the autism to dig through all the breadcrumbs sure and work out all the technological details but at the end of the day it's very easy to get why oracles are the next big thing.

Even a low iq normie should have a light bulb go off in his head. It's about connecting the blockchain world to the real world and the internet. It's the difference between computers before and after internet. Everybody can understand this and should be excited for this.

Are we just too early? It's been one year already. I just don't understand. Where are the normies?

Chainlink is actually going to be $1000 by the end of 2018, and I can prove it.

Chainlink scam

Even if hypothetically the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges in the future an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

I know most of (crypto)/biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". The idea that any of real world companies would give the go ahead if approached them to put companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency medium called Chainlink, that they've never heard of. They already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

>"But muh Chainlink is trustless!"
Is that really a good thing?

Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of chainlink? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have high reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen or some fucking high rep neet node.

Change my mind.

or adam and steve on the weekly chart?

I hodl chainlink and looking at the market, $1000 per link seems likely after mainnet and gaining the interest of the derivatives market. Sybil attacks are solved and most of my qualms are put to rest

HOWEVER, my only remaininh shred of doubt is that $1000 link means Sergey is worth around $100 Billion and the other co founders are worth $50 Billion. They will all become the richest people in the world similar to Gates, Bezos, and Buffet. This part perplexes me because why aren't the founders of BTC and Vitalik also worth close to Gates and Buffet? The growth for chainlink to reach $1000 will be that of ETH or BTC during the 2017 Bullrun.


Believing in $1000 link also means believing the 5 people at chainlink are each worth as much as Gates and Bezos. Does this seems like a stretch to you?

Need advice:

>Want to add to my chainlink stack but the price is too high.
>Figure I would buy some coins on the dip

Should I:

A. Buy link anyway at 0.42
B. Buy ADA at the dip but risk it going down further
C. Buy BAT as it might go high soon with the CB listing.
D. Buy something else regardless like ZRX, HOT, ENG, NPXS, BTC, XRP, ETH, XLM, XMR, EOS, ZEC

Serious question. Why don't we have Pump and Dump /biz/ group???

We used raid many moons ago. Similarly why don't we look out for our fellow autists and raid together on binance???

>household take home pay:$14,500/mo (me: 12k, wife at 2.5k)
>$250k 4B/2.5ba full brick colonial in popular subdivision so it should sell quick if we put it on the market: $2000/mo
>Bills/obligations:$2000/mo
>food/gas/entertainment/dates:$2000
>max roth/401k there is more that is tax deductible: $1500/mo

$7000/mo leftover...

What should I do with this money if I want to make it?

Things to consider: We want to start having kids in 1-2 years (we both just turned 30) which will deduct $1500/mo in day care for a few years. We may upgrade to a nicer house around $600k-$700k (at a 15 year mortgage so we can start buying an oceanfront vacation property in 15 years) which will increase our mortgage payments up to $5k. We are hoping to have $500-$1k per mo saved for vacation x2 annually.

What do you advise we do with our current leftover money if we want to "make it"?

Microsoft + Chainlink = cryptlets

Accord + Chainlink = smart clauses

>>10854704
>>10854699

>>Through this universal tokens, blockchains can interact freely with each other. Proxy tokens are not native to a specific blockchain, as they can be introduced on any distributed ledger. In the future, this concept will be expended to encompass securities and private equity as well.

Sounds like it does pretty much what this faggy infographic is trying to say.

http://fortune.com/2018/08/24/world-bank-blockchain-bond/

Also, r/cc is on track on something, they need our held

>>10679717
Reminds me of

>the potentially leading company in smart contracts is literally SmartContract and uses smartcontracts.com
>smartcontract(s).com will probably become the number one Google result, so any normie researching it once smart contracts become a buzzword will inevitably end up there
>even if it wasn't registered by szabo, the sheer coincidence of it being registered a few days before the bitcoin white paper makes me wonder how important the domain name itself will be in all this
What are the odds for this?
I can't tell if it's a legit advantage or a curse in disguise.
Microsoft isn't named Operation System, Google isn't named Search Engine, Facebook isn't called Social Media Bitcoin wasn't launched by a company named Cryptocurrency. Are there examples of successful companies named so literally? What do you guys think about this?