/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19125862
>just sign up for our KYC and then you can start using our decentralized network. Just make sure you don't do anything too edgy or we'll block your access to our decentralized network.

There are unironically people on this board right now who STILL hold link after Vitalik confirmed it was centralized and would not be the "one" oracle solution.

Linkers will pretend Vitalik doesn't understand what decentralization is but we all know he does and confirmed Chainlink is centralized and will not be the "one" oracle solution.

How will linkers ever recover from this?

>>19080733
Cause Vitalik confirmed it was centralized and would not be the "one" oracle solution.

>>18725819
>>18726181
No one with high IQ uses Chainlink KYC oracles. They use Open Oracle instead.

>>18725527
Vitalik confirmed it's centralized and won't be the "one' oracle solution though.

>>18708073
why did you invest in centralized oracles marketing themselves (lying) as decentralized oracles?

>>18707813
Daily reminder, chainlink is centralized and will not be the "one" oracle solution

>>18706641
considering Vitalik has confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt that Chainlink is centralized and will NOT be the "one" oracle solution... I highly doubt doubt any of your predictions are correct.

>>18704539
>>18704571
Learn to code brainlets.

The domain has been transferred and resold many times since 2008. A simple whois history search would tell you that.

But your IQ is too low and you don't know how to code, so you wouldn't know.

Just like you don't know that Chainlink is not sybil resistant and will never be the "one" Oracle solution.

You think you are a keen software investor, despite having never written a line of code and not understanding software at all. You are the very definition of dunning–kruger.

>>18703385
considering Vitalik has confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt that Chainlink is centralized and will NOT be the "one" oracle solution... it's just the beginning

>>18691333
you mean our proven facts?

>>18689122
>>18689033
>>18689191
>>18689263
Learn to code brainlets.

Open Oracle is literally a COMPETING standard. And Coinbase chose it instead.

The fact that Chainlink can also use this standard is irrelevant. Anyone can use the standard. The point is no one will be using Chainlink anymore, they'll be using Open Oracle, cause it's superior.

>>18689401
It's a proven fact that it is not. The only person who claims it is is Sergey himself, and he's a known liar.

>>18688209
>>18688220
considering Vitalik has confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt that Chainlink is centralized and will NOT be the "one" oracle solution... no

>>18676880
>is to just make a shitton of promises but with no actual product whatsoever
sounds like Chainlink. They've been promising decentralized oracles for 4 years and they haven't even started working on a sybil resistant consensus algorithm.

They obviously have no clue how to do it and have given up.

>>18666481
No. It makes Chainlink obsolete.

Can Chainlink use it? Sure. Anyone can.

But will people use Chainlink AND Open Oracle? No, they won't. They'll use only one of the 2. And Open Oracle is a better, FREE, NO TOKEN, NO KYC version of Chainlink.

In fact it's so much better, that Coinbase decided to use it INSTEAD of Chainlink.

Linkers really need to learn to code and/or increase their IQ. Their arguments are pure cope and come from a place of extreme ignorance about the tech.

>>18656064
kek, learn to code. your very own statement just proves Chainlink is NOT sybil resistant. You are the literal definition of dunning–kruger.

You cannot ask 100 random nodes, because those 100 nodes could be the same person hiding himself.

That's the very thing that makes Chainlink NOT sybil resistant. It's the very definition of NOT sybil resistant.

It's fucking incredible that brainlets like yourself who've never written a single line of code in their life, who don't even know the meaning of what "a sybil" is, are fucking arguing with literal software engineers about what is and what is not sybil resistant.

You're obviously too retarded to comprehend the topic at hand, so why not just listen to Vitalik who confirms it's not sybil resistant?

>>18656840
learn to code, you have dunning–kruger

Chainlink is not decentralized, important, nor innovative.

It's literally centralized KYC oracles that 3 guys could code in a month.

The blog posts and whitepaper you recommend reading are lies to fool non-programmers like yourself into thinking there's some great decentralized tech coming eventually.

Guess what, it's been 4 years, they haven't even started on it. You've been scammed. Learn to code.

>>18653997

chainlink is centralized in literally every way

>>18653998
of course not, the fud is literal facts, you can't refute proven facts, so they just call it "old fud" instead

>>18647851
pretty bearish for Chainlink. If Chainlink bends the knee to the Open Oracle System, it's over for them.

They become 1 participant in the Open Oracle network instead of being THE oracle network.

Of course it was already predicted by vitalik that Chainlink wouldn't be the "one" oracle solution.

Extremely bearish for Chainlink. Coinbase clearly chose Open Oracle over them, and instead of just being a blog post like most "bend the knee" partnerships, it's an actual product that you can use today.

>>18647220
Chainlink is actually more centralized than Open Oracle. With Chainlink you have to KYC. With Open Oracle each API provider just needs to add some signature to their response.

Maybe you should learn to code?

>>18644521
It's centralized oracles, as confirmed by Vitalik.

Maybe you should learn to code, and then "try again"?