/biz/ - Business & Finance

[>>49950238 again; faggot jannies threw a tantrum about a post of mine]

>>49950549
>That graph shows (>>49950238) we are in fact not at all-time highs
>not hovering at all-time-highs
check picrelated. it is hovering at all-time-highs

>labor participation rate being in the toilet
did you know that people not working right now but by some definition "are looking for employment" are counted as "employed" in muh labor furz precipitation rate?
you probably didn't.

>That metric doesn't account for the 10 million plus workers gone.
there are no 10 million plus workers gone
once again, employment in total is hovering at all time highs in the USA.

>>49950444
don't try to pitch your mere observation as an argument
>is always
>past performance something something future... something else
we don't know if that will remain common indefinitely
>i didn't say anything about whether it predicts recessions
you did as you proclaimed one circumstance as a predicator for the other.
the time frame wasn't specified so it defaults to indefinitely.

calling others smol brained isn't nice either.