/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20236203
I'm saying 1k isnt EOY, it's PER year. You gay faggots are just too low iq to understand.

>>20035309
You have a set number of node operators, that will be vetted/kyc'd/hand picked. The entire idea of all this link being "locked up" means EXACTLY that. Refer to >>20034466 . Best case scenario is a ROI of 8.5% pre operating costs for highly secured nodes. No reasonable company can function off those margins, let alone horde enough to dry up supply.

Realistically in a perfect scenario, SWIFT is buying up 680m a year as rewards to the nodes, who then have to sell most if not all of it to function as a business. High side is maybe 15% gets retained for larger cappacity/GPI growning and collat growing with it? 10% for privately owned nodes holding as an investment (most market sell the 500k node payments even now). So full integration is going to mean .71% increase in daily volume compared to today, which at 4% is about half of normal.

You guys are literally level 1 poker players...this isnt some chink coin where memes like "80% supply locked sirs" works. I've given you the (pretty basic) math functions behind how to actually calculate this shit, instead of drooling on yourself and praying.

If you werent such newfags you'd know that cow poster is extremely bullish... im just realistic on shit. Gaming (gambling) will bring in 100+usd per link per year within the next 2-3 years easily. That puts the valutation (@10% roi) over 1k. Learn where this shit is actually important, not fighting over who is more nigger tier MoneyGram XRP faggots or you 500 linky reddit homosexuals.