/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>21552126
>he doesn't see the falling wedge
short it with max leverage anon

>>20271178
>It doesn't mean we're forced to kill each other
notice how this is the conclusion you immediately jumped to?
whoever or whatever put this idea in your head is the one in control. I don't fully understand it myself, but we've been feeding it and it's still hungry.

>>13312033
wasted dubs.
the exchanges themselves are a counterparty risk.
They could be running fractional reserves, which invalidates the capped supply.
This could happen on accident.
The trades are happening on an SQL database, not on chain.
A corrupt employee could steal or embezzle funds with nobody even noticing until it's too late.
A hacker could find an exploit crediting them with a shit load of bitcoin. Which I believe is what happened a mtgox.
And why the fuck would a hacker bother with your little 0.15 BTC? They want the big fat exchange wallets. That's the honey pot with thousands of cones nobody would even notice if they went missing.

>>12913611
Haven't you learned?
Bitcoin has the brand recognition.
Everybody knows what bitcoin is.
Nobody knows what ether is.
Nobody even knows what a crypto currency is.

ETH has a hell of a lot more scaling challenges than bitcoin. At any point some hammy dapp could brick the network.

BTC has a higher risk profile than most normies are comfortable with. ETH has a much greater risk profile than bitcoin.