/biz/ - Business & Finance

>sub 100 sats
I feel as if this milestone deserved a thread

congrats

>>14547934
>BIG PLANS

we tried to warn you

its been between 2-3 cents for 6 months now...

>team is trash and under-qualified that lied during ico
>"back to the drawing board" after a year of doing nothing beside releasing a javascript button
>the original founders NEVER make public appearances
>no special tech
>no actual partnerships

REQ is a soft exit scam
they'll pay the team its remaining 75k eth until theyre out of money and come out with another scam project just like they did before

>>12810933
>>12810322
the raised 120k eth
they have 55k left
gotta pay their retirement funds somehow

imagine being REQT and seeing the team is buying another projects tokens

update on the teams vacation is out later today
last update was on Dec 11th
expect a lot of news

>>11728525
LMAO how is this the most upboated
the redditors are revolting

why didn't they listen when wiki dropped them? that was their signal to sell

>team takes moneytis investor money, investors lose money
>team “pivots” to request network while in YC
>worst, most incompetent YC team in winter batch and everyone knows it
>cashes in on ico craze
>steals logo from other company
>tricks investors with muh fiat muh mainnet muh ING partnership
>squats in kyber’s office to steal their code, since the req team can hardly code for themselves
>accomplishes no tasks
>req team exposed by wiki france for being lazy, uncommunicative. turns out to be true all along
>suspicious eth and req token transfers from team wallets, coinciding with major dumps
>pushing roadmap goals further and further out until they can dump all their vested tokens in Oct. 2019
>sudden silence on pwc france development (there’s nothing even remotely completed)
>they call it v2...when it really is just starting from scratch because they still haven’t put in enough effort to integrate btc
>plan for pivot after vesting period and dumping of req tokens

Get out of this scam investment while you can.

the team admitted they wont have a product until Q1 2019 and thats just basically their MVP lol
I'd value this at a 10m mcap at best which is around 7 cents

I cant believe pwc is still carrying these lazy french fucks on their back

>check subreddit
>its a ghost town
they're in full acceptance that req is a failure
I still cant believe the mcap is still so high considering they're rebranding and starting the project over from scratch in 2019

>>11623763

>request team
budget: $30m
released:
2 smart contracts
broken crowdfunding site
working on:
losing partnerships
writing project updates

>1 reddit mod
budget: mozzarella
released:
woocommerce plugin
shopify plugin
donations app
working on:
request mobile wallet
bitcoin integration

>no ceo
>0 public appearances by cfo/cto (founders)
>reddit mod creating literally 75% of all products
>roadmap dropped after 6 months
>wikipedia and ING dropped them
>launch partners Bee token and fundrequest were both scams
>btc impossible to integrate with collecting request fees
>no one using the network - woo/shopify plugins both failures
>no devs using the dev slack suggesting no teams developing even though the team said there were over 10 in the summer under NDA

I could go on

>outsource literally everything to a reddit mod
who's still buying this french scam?

req reached $1 on speculation and reddit hype before ANY product was released
it's now overvalued for what they released since April imo
a couple of smart contracts and a reddit mod... yikes
factor that in with no one is using the network since no one is dumb enough to spend their crypto and you'll accept why req sucks

>lets put ING on our ico page so people actually think were a compotent team and can accomplish our roadmap
>raise $30 million
>remove the logo and any acknowledgement they are working together right before you announce you're outsourcing all work to the lowest bidder in india
>get called out by wikipedia for being lazy

FRENCHED

>up $.002
>moon

>>11300854
this is why req crashed so hard
they have no competitive advantage over any other possible decentralized payment projects after an entire year

>no fiat liquidity/integration
>no btc integration
just a couple of eth smart contracts and a reddit mod

what sucks even more is that kyber recently had to develop their own payments gateway when they realized req wasnt going to accomplish anything meaningful

https://www.coindesk.com/this-dex-is-enabling-payments-in-any-ethereum-token/

>Kyber Is Enabling Decentralized Payments
>One of the driving forces behind the steady increase in integrations has been Kyber’s support for decentralized payments. This simple and accessible integration allows vendors to accept payments in supported ERC20 tokens while still receiving funds in their preferred token such as ETH or stable coins like DAI, TUSD, and DGX. Various platforms have started utilizing Kyber’s technology: Peepeth, ETHIS, and Etheremon are three that we would like to highlight.

plus there's no autist savants on req's team to create anything groundbreaking so they must rely on others to develop the tech

>.2 CENTS
OH NO NO NONONO
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

WASSA WASSA WASSA

>he didnt see all the red flags

why would anyone buy this shit after wikipedia called them out for being a lazy team?
that was your sign to SELL
REQ was .30 when wikipedia shit all over them

why don't they buy some of their tokens back?

>>10005914