/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11564723

This shit has been pumping for a month

>>11487116

Well, I am not comfortable saying everything is fine because of Chinese partnerships, DNV GL and Breyer Anon.

> Chinese partnerships - Not really sold on the extent and depth Chinese partnerships and how much they will be using VTHO.

> Breyer - is an just a advisor. He's also a VC and goes in early and takes profit early. He knows how to make money. He's also been wrong A LOT.

> DNV GL - Undoubtedly this is a good sign but they seem to be relying on leaving the technical aspect to VeChain

Now the technical aspect is what I am really concerned about. VeChain resources have been very thin on the technical aspects. Also Sunny, Kevin Fang and Jialiang Gu have not shown that that they are very good at communicating the technical aspects of VeChain. Either it's it's not their strong point or it's a language barrier.

In both cases this is not good. Vechain needs some charismatic technical salespeople who can communicate the technical aspects to western enterprises so that there is adoption of this technology. It's very concerning that we don't have any technical material or anyone who can communicate at a technical level.

>>11431478

> innovation

> pointless ERC-20 tokens
> pointless POW coins mostly forks of one thing or another
> pointless enterprise cryptos which are vaporware marketing

Probably 1 crypto, Bitcoin, would have been more than enough and we'd all profit. Now the crypto market is watered down with two thousand scams

>>10850202

Best counter argument is probably BTC network effect and Lightening Network.

Also, Nano has yet to get the mainstream exposure where its security and spam defense is tested.

Yeah but definitely one of the only handful of cryptos that will be around in the future.