/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24937581

>>24272246
>>24272366
Thomas told us on slack Sergey is always late for zoom meetings because he keeps wandering into black neighborhoods yelling "NIGGER" and picking up street fights "to get used to the pain", lately he's become obsessed with challenging vitalik to a cage fight, guy's an unstoppable bloodthirsty maniac, poor vitalik gonna get crushed like a bug...

>>21603246
wtf sergey just punched the cameraman out of nowhere, cnn just said this could disqualify him from the contest
this would be extremely disastrous for the link token if the erc council decides to take action

>>20587969
America, Japan, Australia...some small others.

>>20588019
I think RENprotocol is a fucking GAME changer...it's the only BTC on ETH that I really trust TRUST because of the Darknode set up. It's an interop layer for all blockchains which is amazing.

>>20588084
I farmed COMP at the start...not on this list.

>>20588142
Yes...yes you will

CHAINLINK MEMES!

>>14206388
I'm excited, that's why I like talking to you so much, i must say fren, who ever you are, thank you. I have not had conversations like this in a very long time.

>>12518535
i think so, look at that hook

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yKL9_J9rbE

>>11988994
BAIT
A
I
T

Chainlink is memed too hard to NOT be a legitimate project

I think Chainlink enables the "holy grail" of cryptography known as online one-time padding.

One time padding involves all parties sharing a key used to encrypt a message but it's a bit of a chicken and egg problem since you first need a secure way for everyone involved to share the key. For this reason it's been relegated to an offline encryption method only (I write the key down and walk it over to your house).

Buuuut now with Chainlink data provider oracles on a blockchain it seems you can just enter a smart contract with all involved parties and the Chainlink node will generate a key for all parties to use through the contract which distributes it securely via the blockchain.

Now you might say, well in this case you're trusting a third party, namely the Chainlink node operator, that he/she won't snoop on the key generated for you and look at your data... Very valid concern. But, Chainlink nodes can implement Intel SGX enclaves where nothing, not even the OS can see what's being processed by the node. No way for the node operator to see the key that his/her computer generated for you.

Seems to me we've arrived at a way for secure online distribution of symmetric keys (vs the current public/asymmetric system)... And that's huge.

>>11537293

What will happen to our money if Sergey gets locked up in the prison? He can´t keep doing this while he is the CEO of our project. We should step in as a community to get Sergey to attend some kind of anger management course or something.

This is very bad news for LINK

>>10838863
>big macs were just for bulking and cultivating mass
nice