/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>15201953
>Why does this have value?
>Cause there's literally noone interested in it
that makes a lot of sense, bro.
>If you do try to buy some, you will probably clean half the order book
so you're saying that there's very little supply available on the market? How is that coherent with no one wanting it? If it'd be a mass-printed shittoken, then there would be a massive supply at minimal price, like brapper.

>>15201962
looks like you've been following 0xBTC threads and know that it's the only token with any unique features at all. 0xBitcoin is the first token without an owner. All previous ERC20s are owned and centralized. Good luck with those bags.

>>11173658
True that, but I have lost all hope that he will come to his senses, since he is clearly fudding with ulterior motives. It's just so the lurkers would see how stupid the shit he posts is.

>>11137831
This picture describes you so accurately it's not even funny

>>10962930
>I have called them scoundrels, parasites, swindlers, profiteers, it all ran of them like water off a raincoat. But maybe I should call them a different name from which they recoil, become injured and suddenly shrink back.
I've got a pretty good quote for you as well

>>10879899
>the logarithmic nature of pow made it easy for the founders to mine thousands of coins for a little price, then they start shilling in 4chan to dump on other people,
Is Bitcoin a scam, yes or no? This is just like Bitcoin, early comers get more rewards, Satoshi himself mined almost a million BTC. If you dislike 0xBitcoin, then you must also dislike Bitcoin.

Basically you're just running around in circles trying to play stupid (not that there's a whole lot of playing involved), so I'll just make this real easy for you. In the far away times of before 2018, you had things that were either
>A: pure PoW mined
>B: compatible with smart contracts
0xBitcoin is the first cryptocurrency ever to exist that combines A and B into one asset. If smart contracts are widely adopted, then they will need some kind of a medium of exchange, a currency if you will. What better asset to use than one that incorporates all of the principles of good ol' Bitcoin onto the Ethereum network?

>founders got a unfairly big ammount of coins
The distribution is fair, since anyone could have mined it since day 1. Giving everyone in the world an equal amount of something for doing nothing is not fair distribution, giving everyone in the world the OPPORTUNITY to work to obtain something is fair distribution. It's just pathetic how 0xBitcoin fudders simply have to blindly keep repeating their mantra, even when everything they have to say has been completely countered. Pic related describes the likes of you perfectly, I made it specially for you, enjoy.

Oh, and btw, it's spelled "amount", you incredible pajeet, not "ammount". It shouldn't be too hard to write correctly with a spellchecker.