/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>22413507
>tfw no wendys 4for4

>>22413531
I rented out the upstairs the first year I lived there to a guy I knew from work
it wasn't terrible, but I just like living alone 2bh

>>16561477
watch this first:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNifUszz2zA

then:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/volatility.asp
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volatility_(finance)
https://m.wikihow.com/Calculate-Historical-Stock-Volatility
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/010915/volatility-good-thing-or-bad-thing-investors-point-view-and-why.asp

>>13974444
lotta other things went on between then and now besides the Fed getting a little dovish

I'm not saying they'll be able to save the economy with more free money.
I just want to provide some warning to people who take up certain bearish positions (short equities or leveraged long bonds). It can go wrong for you even if you're 'right' about the weakness of the economy and the markets.

Bears have been crying since forever when they short a rotten market but it doesn't crash as much as it should, or when it should, especially when the cause is blatant Fed intervention.
Guess what, even though they're 'right', those bears can still be wiped out, they can still lose money

gotta structure your positions correctly for all the interesting things that can happen.

Bonds aren't a sure answer, they're not the only answer. Same for cash. Same for index funds. they should be part of a larger strategy taking into account all the weird and creative things that the fed could (and probably will) do to save boomer pensions

>>13974464
this is correct


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPWxLFoh-kA

>>13801337
big brain
wait no that's dumb
tell me about BGS again

>>13728235
>LGF buyout!
you mean
https://nypost.com/2019/05/17/cbs-looking-to-buy-starz-from-lionsgate/
?

>>13728320
yes of course
but you explicitly said
>That’s not a meeting, that is a pre scheduled event they will both attend. No trade talk will happen.
which is wrong. I may have gone too far by calling you a name. I apologize for that. I was strained mentally, emotionally, and spiritually by the fact that I posted three (3) links with relevant information that you ignored.

>>13632452
you said it ;-)
I was being sarcastic but I'm glad that you've noted the HEART of the issue: how long does it take for China to cave as they see manufacturing infrastructure start to pop up in surrounding countries?
that is THE most important point right now
china wants its poor Asian neighbors to stay poor and without industrial base. They want to do all the manufacturing.

you know, it doesn't take THAT long to make a big building that produces plastic junk. A year, maybe two or three considering all the infrastructure. makes sense?

>>13632463
also tru ;^)