/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11865694
>Always met with suspicion even though their logos are all over smartcontract.com and Chainlink graphics everywhere
This is something I don't have insider information about, but I've argued that Chainlink indeed has contact with those companies. It's like,
>US Citizens cannot participate in ICO
>No marketing of ICO
>No marketing whatsoever until the software is testable for utility
>Everything said is focused on the how other devs can find utility in the network
>No mention of token value
>BUT, logos on the website

How could it be that smartcontract.com took so many precautionary measures in their ICO and pre-testnet public image, and just fuck it up with misleading logos that suggest a partnership with major payments providers.

This is seriously something to think about.

>>11536569
some anon in some thread today said something about how there's so much information out there, that it takes a decentralized team of NEETs to pieces things together. Yeah, marine, we've done our bit for chainlink research and now we're retired and on reserve. It was an honor to serve in the chainlink community research arm

>move somewhere cheaper
I make 180k in Boston as a software dev, pay 2.5k a month for a 900sq ft apartment walking distance from my work.

If I moved out to the suburbs I'd have to take a 50k paycut, or have a 30+ min commute. Fuck that.

I don't get delivery and don't go to any establishment that has waiters or delivery as an option. Tipping is a retarded concept at best, and a welfare scheme for poorfags at worst. I would love to abolish "voluntary" aka socially enforced tipping in USA, although highly unlikely because waiters reeee at the thought.

Anyone know what is going on in this situation? I saw three women came forward (coindesk), but now all articles or even mention of it seem scrubbed clean off of google.

I don't want this shitstain to get away with it.