/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24373335
For reference

>>24292600
inb4 you to start replying to yourself again and have 30 posts by this ID of "legitimate FUD that no one ever addresses" like yelling pajeet or vaporware scam
see you at $10

>>24287210
Anon, these are the same people who vehemently denied that XSN collaborated with the Litecoin Foundation after being presented multiple LTC-based sources, githubs, a RT from Charlie Lee.. while simultaneously circlejerking themselves from the same ID to make it seem like their concerns were genuine.
I genuinely welcome and encourage legitimate FUD or concerns. It's very rare. Instead, it's just the same few long-refuted things everyday, followed by them overreacting when someone doesn't give them attention and answer it for the 80th time.

>>23912951
>>23913015
>a statement directly from the Litecoin Foundation's website isn't proof that X9 collaborated with the LTC devs
kek