/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51572291
> REQ solves this

> Invoicing with Fiat Payments
https://twitter.com/RequestNetwork/status/1325817513041670145

>>20009217
> The open network for transaction requests

>>17684441
voilà REQ will never be below $.01 again

>>17638492
voilà™

>>14904284

Feels like REQ when that Anon kept posting it'd go to $0.02. This shit will definitely be under $0.10 in a couple of months and below $0.05 next year.

>>13793804

thank you for your contribution

>>13538141

>he didn't sell REQ when it was $1
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .70
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .50
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .45
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .35
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .40
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .30
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .25
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .20
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .15
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .10
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .05
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .02
***YOU ARE HERE***
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .01
>***he doesn't have enough to buy ROPE***

>>13471009

Over the last 2 years much more than $30 Million. And looking at the volume some retards have continued to buy what they think is the bottom. These buyers are going to absolutely get fucked up the ass when 150 Million REQ is unlocked in November

>>13254567

We provided REQ team a great lifestyle for delivering nothing. Why should we apologize?

>>12919785

>he didn't sell REQ when it was $1
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .70
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .50
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .45
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .35
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .40
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .30
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .25
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .20
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .15
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .10
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .05
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .02
***YOU ARE HERE ***
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .01
>he didn't sell when they ran out of funds

>>12911737
>Literally stealing

Two French faggots literally stole from stole from dumb mother fuckers is correct

https://www.linkedin.com/in/etiennetatur/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/christophel1310/

founded failed money transfer company Moneytis

https://www.linkedin.com/company/moneytis/

which has exactly ONE employee right now. So they decided an easier route was to scam you with the Request Network

>>12896419
>most robust FinTech credentials in the space

Two French faggots

https://www.linkedin.com/in/etiennetatur/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/christophel1310/

founded failed money transfer company Moneytis

https://www.linkedin.com/company/moneytis/

which has exactly ONE employee right now. So they decided an easier route was to scam you with the Request Network since they now had all this "robust FinTech credentials"

It's 2019. Wake the fuck up. Exactly how fucking dumb are you?

>>12886090

>he didn't sell REQ when it was .70
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .50
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .45
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .35
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .40
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .30
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .25
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .20
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .15
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .10
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .05
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .02
>***YOU ARE HERE***
>he didn't sell REQ when it was .01
>***he didn't sell when they ran out of funds***

>>12682235

fuck off you frog eating scammer

The one piece of FUD about Chainlink that gets to me isn't even an argument or copypasta, it's simple FUD by association. It's the fact that the same /biz/ autists who were researching and shilling Chainlink last fall were also doing the same for Request. If you weren't here last bull run, LINK and REQ were popularly portrayed as /biz/ brothers in arms, two projects that had been researched down to the last footnote, team member and webpage element and determined by the /biz/ collective to be absolutely bulletproof investments.

Then literally within 3 months REQ went from golden goose to toxic waste. From an all-star team blazing a path towards a world standard crypto-fiat exchange protocol and the world's first triple-entry accounting system, to a bumbling mozzarella scam that literally deleted its roadmap because missing all their milestones was getting to be too embarassing for them to handle.

So while I'm all-in Chainlink, I have this little inkblot of doubt in the back of my mind I just can't shake. If /biz/ could make REQ look like such a sure thing, then who's to say that /biz/ isn't just as deluded about Chainlink? Sure, LINK has kept their shit together longer than REQ did. They've cobbled some partnerships together and they haven't royally fucked up any milestones or public appearances so far. And yet if REQ could fall to ruin in a few scant months, who's to say it couldn't still happen to Chainlink? No matter how fucking good they look right now. They could go full mozzarella on our asses in an instant.

>>11554870

Monsieur Anon, I am sorry for scamming you.

>>11544381

> Thank you Anon

>>11487504

Why would anyone buy back into a scam?

>>10496440

> New Use Case: Buy mozzarella with REQ

This weeks update

>>10451439

> Cashing out monthly by dumping REQ
> Haven't touched $38 Million in ETH from ICO money

Dream come true for REQ team.

These fuckers haven't even spent the $38 Million. Instead they've been dumping REQ tokens on investors and living a lavish life.

And REQlets have been saying they're accumulating cheap tokens XD

I got Frenched

Apol. Igize