/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>10813345
>Know little above a layman's understanding of the technology your company works in? Check
>Publicly humiliated and forced out of the company they founded? Check
>Put 50 million out of their own pocket into a hardware company cum children's animation and merchandise company? TBA
>Founded a technology company with no clearly defined market and way too expensive that undergoes three bussiness model changes? TBA
>Flips around desktop computer company into most valuable consumer electric brand in world? TBA
>Black Mock Turtleneck? Check

Bonus: lie to CFO and say that board has already endorsed backdating stock options

3/6 a'in't bad

>>10115849
NEET here, it's simplicity - blue hides stains that come from sweat and coffee stains easier and also >>10116950 no need to design an outfit every fucking morning, rotating shirt and pant combinations - deciding which tie suites your mood. That's why even after earning 11 million dollars in 1971 Stanley Kubrick still dressed, in Steven Spielberg's words "kinda schleppy" (((((as if we didn't know you were one of them steveie)))), he did a Bart Simpson and bought a whole bunch of the same outfit and wore them until they wore out. He would have argued that cumulatively over a decade it would have saved him almost 1000 hours that could have been better spent checking if the ads for Full Metal Jacket in the Jakata Newspaper are the exact margins and spacing that he demanded for optimal readability, or if the cinema in San Francisco that is doing a screening of Barry Lyndon has the right matte for the projector (1:66)