/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16871187
Be gone stinky. Ground floor gains only around here.

>>16644440
Kek. Would have been perfect if you included mention of the 98.5% token burn

>>16420244
Lol unironically the same, I wasn't done loading up .. fuck, and now look at it go. This is just beginning to wake up

What is your excuse for refusing to do even the most basic due diligence on new altcoins like ATOM and XDB?

>>15928352
Holy shit, it's India: The Post

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

You stinky pajeets! Go shit in the street.

Next time try posting about an actually decent project such as pic related, Digitalbits

>>15925554

>>15885372
>>15885393
This an XDB meme takeover

>>15616550
How many times do we need to go over this with you fudders?

>muh low supply
Mostly locked for literal ages, unsold tokens (in the billions) likely to be burned.

>low circulating supply
Yes, little to no tokens were sold, hence low circulation. Rest is locked up. Literally the same as any other project. Circulating supply defines market cap in crypto, just check any site.

>With total supply...
Well, total supply is irrelevant and always has been, especially in the short term.

Remember when /biz/ called this a scam? Multiple publicly listed companies now confirmed to be using it in the next couple of months. Announcements coming soon.

DigitalBits is going to fucking moon soon. CMO of Walmart is on the team and last AMA confirmed MULTIPLE publicly listed companies are going to begin using XDB.

With a minimum XDB requirement of 10 XDB per customer, even a small scale pilot from each of the companies will spike token price like crazy. That plus it's now proven only 2% of the supply is released with no more tokens coming out until late 2020.

>inb4 muh undiluted supply FUD
Swing trade it then you retard. This is the most obvious buy in history.

You still aren't in, are you anon?
I don't know what to tell you other than we tried to warn you.
It's not too late.

>>15431277
>he doesn't have XDB
should we tell him?