[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.52424718 [View]
File: 517 KB, 799x628, haahahah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52424718

>>52424632
a-at least they are not wash trading

>> No.49509672 [View]
File: 517 KB, 799x628, haahahah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49509672

>>49509656

>History is needed for a full sync of the chain, but it isn’t needed for validating new blocks (this just requires state). So once a client has synced to the tip of the chain, historical data is only retrieved when requested explicitly over the JSON-RPC or when a peer attempts to sync the chain. With EIP-4444 implemented, we’d need to find alternative solutions for these.

>Clients will be unable to “full sync” using devp2p as they do today – they will instead “checkpoint sync” from a weak subjectivity checkpoint that they’ll treat as the genesis block.

>Note that weak subjectivity won’t be an added assumption – it’s inherent in the shift to PoS anyway. This necessitates that valid weak subjectivity checkpoints be used to sync due to the possibility of long-range attacks. The assumption here is that clients will not sync from an invalid or old weak subjectivity checkpoint. This checkpoint must be within the period that we start pruning historical data (i.e., within one year here) otherwise the p2p layer would be unable to provide the required data.

>> No.29914577 [View]
File: 518 KB, 799x628, haahahah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29914577

>>29913801
>Is Doge taken seriously?

>> No.29672934 [View]
File: 518 KB, 799x628, haahahah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29672934

>>29672828
>people watching walk

>> No.29223961 [View]
File: 518 KB, 799x628, haahahah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29223961

>>29223763
>The easiest way to buy is for me to send link to my coinmetro account and swap to XCM?
he said link as in a link to the website, and his link is not the real url its his own link

>> No.26732677 [View]
File: 518 KB, 799x628, haahahah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26732677

>>26732614
thats it?

>> No.26223642 [View]
File: 518 KB, 799x628, haahahah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26223642

>>26222971
look at the market cap of both anon...

>> No.23633689 [View]
File: 518 KB, 799x628, haahahah.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23633689

>>23633680

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]