/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26207021
>If you dont trust it, I'm fine with it. It isn't a 100% assurance of safety after all. But at least, for the love of god, try to practice ways to prevent corona. At least. Jesus Christ. Corona is spreading fast because of retards who don't know how to wear masks or distance.

>>22758739
> you lost you lost you lost!

>>22750024

>>22603223
>>22603296
>>22603423
> t. Poor faggots.

uh oh muh stonks uh oh

>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH WE'RE ALL GONNA MAKE IT BRO'S

>TECH GIANT
>TECH GIANT
>TECH GIANT
>TECH GIANT
>TECH GIANT
>TECH GIANT

>yeshjh,j crypto new paradigm shift!
>2017 is still in our heartsh!
>we will all make it bro's

Fomooooo
Early bro’s
Millionaire bro
- everyshit coin bag holder

>>19794501
>chainlink
>great thread

>>19756846
>Sauce

>>19753248
>1592000793506.jpg (10 KB, 200x267)
>>>19753225
>Its incredibly pathetic that you came here to make people mad/jealous by posting this

>>19313556
Some of the banks and financial institutes that caused the GFC are in the list. The guys who got bailed out by the U.S. government, then took the bailout money and paid HUGE bonuses to their execs.

Someone in the comments added that there are arms dealers in S&P 500 too. Next to those companies, Facebook and McDonald’s are relative saints.

***

Let's assume you're just about the money, and not letting this bother your conscience. Not judging.

You have to do what you can to survive in a capitalist economy, and you can't afford to reject the safest path to early retirement.

But who’s to say these companies are going to not just last, but grow, in 10, 20, 30 years? Especially the petroleum names in the list. Whose to say the banking system and the U.S. health care system will be the same by then?

I almost hope it won't. In order to be optimistic about the success of your investment, you have to be quite pessimistic about the direction that the world is heading to, and assume that our society won't improve; that we won't kick the bad, destructive habit of fossil fuel. Even Amazon's Bezos recently held a presentation about manning Mars; since he thinks we'll consume the resources here eventually, because we don't want to turn to "rationing" (his bleak interpretation on the degrowth movement, perhaps).

There are some alternatives, and you can probably build an "ethical" investment portfolio and choose less-horrible companies or indexes etc. The management fee will be far higher, and it's considered a less-safe path. Most investors don't. I see the same 3-letter acronyms on FI/RE forums, the same funds people discuss.

And they're all cancer. Lucrative cancer, at least for the time being.

>>18890030
>Does anyone actually enjoy soijack posting? I think it will fad out fast.

>>18736968
>NOOOO YOU'RE THE REAL TARD, I WAS JUST EXPLAINING THINGS MOMMY