/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>53173391
the best shroom stock is to stock up on actual shrooms.

>$20 spores
>$20 spawn bag
>$20 substrate
>$5 plastic bin

grow them and sell them to friends and family. you can get at least 4 flushes and 6 oz from 1 grow.

>$40 8th
>$60 quarter
>$100 half oz
>$200 whole oz

douse your entire work area in 99% iso alcohol.
wipe your spawn bag down with iso.
heat sterilize your spore syringe.
wipe spore syringe with alcohol after heating red hot.
inject spores in spawn. wait 1-2 months until it colonizes and break up and mix up the bag after it's 50% colonized.
mix 1 spawn bag with 1 substrate bag into sterilized plastic bin.
close lid.
wait for pins to form.
crack the lid.
grow mushrooms.
harvest mushrooms.
pour clean water into bin and rehydrate the mushrooms cake.
leave soaking for at least an hour, no longer than 8 hours.
drain water.
crack the lid and repeat.
make sure the walls stay wet and there is moisture droplets on your cake.
buy flarisol water sprayer

i air dry my mushrooms with a shop fan. lay them down in a cardboard box with the fan directly on them 24/7 for about a week or until they are cracker dry.

i buy all my supplies from midwestgrowkits.com

>>19188751
Sweet, I've been looking for this one

>>16145722
yes

Should I learn about economies extensively before starting to learn about investing?

Bulls make money, bears make money... Pigs get slaughtered.

What's with all the pride? Are you really a paid schill?

Digits for $5 LINK EOY

>>12944249

>>12869894
more people have made it in crypto than have won the lottery.

>>12803373
i've been buying dividend paying stocks for about 9 years now and it's really starting to pay off..... about 1k a month passive income.

it was pretty easy. i didn't even max out my IRA for the year once.

idk why people like you (i call them autistic) think it's hard to make money.

perhaps the more accurate statement is "it's hard to SAVE money". but then again, that's not that hard either.

probably just autistic.

>>12666984

ITT: Geniuses

>>12526323
i make SURE to shit every day at work for 15 minutes.

at the end of the year, my boss paid me 40 FUCKING HOURS TO SHIT.

think about that.

i can see a referral ban in your future

>>11635442
i also just did some calculations. i've concluded that OP is most definitely, indubitably, a faggot.

>>11133756
>Scanning...
>Assessing...
>Complete.
Basedness: Positive
Pill code: #ff000

Projected diagnostics accuracy: 99.8%

>>10518393
>We should take away the one feature that makes this website special
>It's not like there already are moderated boards on the internet amirite lmao

>>10465216
>You know how bananas usually taste bad when they're blackened? Well, I ate one so black it could pick cotton on its own and it was delicious, therefore I am smart for eating a nigger banana and you are wrong for trying to dodge risk.

Prove to me that you are not a brainlet and tell me how you would clean this up without getting piss on the floor or on yourself.

Litecoin is going to 350 in exactly one minute or else Im gonna kill myself

>>2864558
>Predict the future with limited information and infinite variability
Come on brainlets you're missing the ride on Apollo 11

how can i make a quick shitcoin like bitbean, that normies will buy up eventually? like you only need to keep investors in loop with social media updates, that shitcoin is improved every month but actually you just want to sell as many shitcoins so you can cash out big boy style.

op here, buying pivx again, seems like that train didn't stop after all.

>>1818765
who cares faggot, omg 311 on police scanner means cp they did it on purpose

theres only 10 fucking numbers in existence. Do you realize how many endless faggy schizophrenic connections you can make between them? You can find anything youre looking for in only 10 units, Combine them in any way and youll find a "message"
Youre stuck in a rabbit hole of retardation, get a grip. Base 10 math is overrated anyway

"Today's parents are producing the unemployed and the homeless."

how do i profit from this?

Can you truly increase employment and the money represented in Keynesian 'wage units' by decreasing the money-wages?

I am skeptic.