/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55171595
So why don't you sel since it's ath?
Buy in again later? That's what I do and I always regret it

https://comitt.com/re-frac

These guys? Not listed for public offering. You guys ever wonder why the best companies aren't listed?

Bob is right. If they need your money they're struggling to make it with their money. Real money won't let poor faggots like us play at all. Bob is just as poor as us when you look like these cats cuz they only walk in tallest of tall cotton.
It's worse than previously expected fellas.
It's giving me the fear

>>54911682
>56+ burgers per share
>Dollar fiddy return in divvies per share
>56,000 yields you 1500

>>54724954
The financial instrument of derivatives are orders of magnitude greater than all mining of anything under the sun combined. Shorting as a miner would be a recipe for disaster simply because their pockets aren't nearly as deep.
>>54724926
Nobody ever manipulated the price of any commodity futures higher. What you're talking about is speculation. This is the ironing out of those wrinkles of volatility. Doing it any other way would naturally lead to consolidation or over correction which would only exasperate the issues that created the volatility initially, whatever that might be.
Imagine introducing yourself to a prisoners dilemma, as a producer, speculating what speculators are speculating in an effort to front run what they may or may not do.
The invisible hand would reward and punish accordingly. For a guy that doesn't believe TA holds any water, you sure do hold fast to the psychological principles while dismissing any quantitative means to delineate them

>>53660356
Kek
So much for that dip...
Appreciate you bluesmonke

>>53482819

>>53145776
Thanks for the laughs. Do keep coming back,

>>52904798
>not cooperating with US big oil
Yes. Canada produces almost no white fracking sand. Wisco produces the best. Lots of reasons outside of that desu.
My investment strategy is based solely around the fact that the pie in the sky green energy, zero emissions, perfectly sustainable planet of the future will have consumed all the resources they claimed would kill us all if we consumed them all
Green energy is net negative. I'm betting they're hypocritical psychopaths and they know green energy is net negative to create a false energy crisis
Oil won't quadruple without a war the next day, but oil field services could easily.
>We don't like fracking
>But we'll use it until we meet our goals
I don't want to detract from anyone's admiration of the emperor's new clothes tho...

Comfy thread is comfy