/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17508314
Also, already the premise of constant starvation falls on its face, when you look how socialist countries like the USSR and China had steady population growth.

Tsarist Russia had constantly famines. The Soviet Union had one in its infancy and then never again till its dissolution.

The CIA admitted as well that the Soviet people had occasionally higher calory consumption than their Murican counterparts.

>>17445936
>Muh gorillion dead people
China was the "Sick Man of Asia" before communists took power. It had constant famines before, some of which were worse than the so-called "Great" one. Which gets overemphasised by western propaganda media. Not to mention how they blatently inflate the numbres, which is why the supposed death rates keep changing. It also downplays other factors, which lead to the famine like natural disasters etc. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_famines_in_China
The Chinese population exploded and life expectancy increased by a lot, due to the improved living conditions thanks to the communists. And that within record time, whereas capitalist countries tend to need centuries to achieve such results if at all.
But let's also ignore that such famines happen in capitalist countries too and more regularly. According to the UN over seven million people starve to death each year worldwide, despite the fact that we produce enough food for over 10 billion people right now -- how efficient (sarcasm).

Also, you clearly haven't even looked at the other part of my last post. Typical closed-minded idiocy.

Things are also not just "not perfect". Thanks to capitalism we are literally heading towards extinction with man-made climate change. This is the biggest failure any system could possibly achieve.