/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19372548
Then why aren't you equally against FRO, STNG, and all other tankers? They are arguably down more than DHT. More than DHT percentage-wise even. STNG still is, FRO was up until "the run." You are arguably exhibiting "buy high sell low" logic instead of taking things as good deals.

>>19372635
If you don't mind a potential dip, yes. In general I think it is better to buy and not worry than try to time and miss out. I would say buy. EURN and STNG are worthy too.

>>18968592
I like that essentially EURN and NAT have a 2:1 price ratio. I much prefer my beautiful 500/500/500 share distribution between FRO, DHT, and NAT, but I have become very wary of NAT the more I researched and compared with EURN and STNG (I never cared about those two much until recently) and heard criticism that was actually constructive of it. I am willing to trade down to 250 shares of EURN for 500/500/250 distribution...unfortunately, but if NAT has a very good day and EURN doesn't then I can up my shares converted, maybe if it is really out of whack I can fill the rest in on margin, idk I am autistic enough to actually make an issue of it. But I will settle for 250 shares instead since it has a lack of a history so it is pure speculation seeing where it is going in the future. I think it is better than NAT though. I don't like STNG in comparison to these so I don't want to take it up. I am thinking of TNP though as a perfect NAT replacement.

We both hold DHT and FRO, just differ on stock 3. I am having a small debate about TNP vs. EURN, but EURN is winning for me so far if simply for the fact they have reported already and announced one hell of a divvy. Maybe if NAT does suddenly real well I can convert shares to 250 for EURN and 100 for TNP, but who knows. 1 good day for NAT is enough for me to make a profit overall off it since I didn't FOMO in from Cramer rally, but if I can get a shitcoin day I would be highly comfy in my conversion. Otherwise stuck bagholding I guess.