/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58408875
Think about it, the worker pools do change things up A LOT. Look at RNDR and their success. It's literally because you can provide GPU power. iExec is the same but you can also provide CPU power and it's all confidential. The worker pools are important. You still need to understand that even though the price action over the years is weak, the team has still been making moves behind the scenes.

https://twitter.com/ConfidentialC2/status/1780206758776000635
Nvidia announced the confidential compute narrative at GTC2024, they started making moves behind the scenes. Nvidia and iExec know each other. It one point the development will be enough for people to notice the project. It's literally the ONLY ONE that does what it does. No other project does the same thing...

>>58023778
You're good. I actually quit weed some time ago. I mean, BTC bottomed November 2022, RLC bottomed in May 2022 and has been in an uptrend. You can't really say it's not true

>>57977330
Don't sell anything and still have sex with a girl? What about that option?

>>57934308
Think again, before you get thrown into endless despair. You should rather buy AGIX & FET... Yes they've pumped by a magnitude of about 20 already, but don't worry. It's called SUSTAINABLE GROWTH

I mean, if you really think about it. Tech did mater from the start, then too many normies came in and tech stopped mattering. Think about it, First BTC pumped because of the tech, then ETH came along and it pumped because of the tech, then we had stuff like DEXes, Defi, play2earn, ... But then last bull run the normies came in and started their fucking dog meme shitcoins movement. That's why this bull run is all about that and we're currently awaiting the biggest influx of stupid retarded lambo-wanting monkeys in existence. How many of the do you think will be interested in the tech side of crypto, if they haven't been around before? If they were really in it for the tech they'd have been here 2 bull runs ago. Except if they were too young...

It's really embarrassing once you think about it

>>57720902
The truth

>>57720966
Wow, they're so jealous they're making memes about RLC in order to try and capture a part of the 262m$ market cap, while they have a 5.7b$ market cap...

You guys must feel awful if you're so desperate as to try and pick on someone 21.75x smaller than you are... RLC must be doing something if you're so afraid.

That is the question

To buy or not to buy?

>>24725225
not sure if you actually think that or if you're just fucking about

>>24553305
My cousin also works at iExec. Is that you Frederic ?

>>23952607
I don't get what you're trying to say, what is not fair?

>>23682500
>>23682672
So what you two fellas are trying to say is that we were a RLC board... Interesting, very very interesting that people see it like that.