/biz/ - Business & Finance

Look at all the normies talking about LInk online. Boasting about their 100 link stack. Even that moron from bar sports shilling link. This will not end well. Expect link to drop to 10$ (necessary to make the normies sell) before we go up again.

Do you believe?

>>21071199
Checked. He is with us in this thread.

>>19986464
never forget.

imagine holding less than 10,000 LINK
just imagine

As much as you can get.

>>16486568
when will you reveal who you are?

>>16467653
god speed.

>>16446724
>singularity

>>16395921

TONIGHT

>>15900522
>>15888888

“Number-related synchronicities are the attempts of non-physical beings to communicate to you that a recent thought or emotion is important to your soul calling. Everyone sees them - the frequency and meaning differs.”
Discuss

>>14886159
>fud
who?

>>14867867
Frenando

Any business/crypto related youtubers you guys follow? I currently watch The Modern Investor for major crypto news, Pustejovsky for real estate topics, and Beat the Bush for general financial videos. Looking to add more to the list.

>>14759531
>(You) are forgiven my child
>Now go, and build something in my name

>>14645403
>>14645226
>By the way some people suspect they was Sergey himself posting due to the writing style and a few other tells and clues.
I hadn't realized it but the writing does seem familiar, and goddam if it isn't too easy to read that in his voice with the same cadence he uses.

Why would he post a picture that is pic related? Maybe it's one of his favorites?

Does anyone have that write up that was posted recently using pic related for the thread? It BTFO's any argument for sybil attacks quite thoroughly. I can't find it on warosu?

Sybil attacks literally aren't an argument when you realize that trust systems existed BEFORE crypto, hence why nodes are only being given to trusted users and kyc currently. Don't feel like writing it all out again but eventually it'll come to a point where there's no incentive to lie.

>>14613847
booooooooo

>>14580754
>I think it is hard to trust people who aren't extremely wealthy when you are, people get jealous and then there is no telling what they will do
that is without a doubt

>>14580754
>I do hope you reconsider, there may be an intermediate way where anonymity is preserved until the group gets to know one another.
in time I will reach out to those who resonate with this
I just don't see a way to do that right now without jeopardizing a lot that I have going on at the moment
Keep in mind, I am a (((normie))) in the day and am a business owner who employs people and therefore it would be reckless of me to jeopardize their livelihoods
And you said it yourself, people get jealous and there is no telling what they will do, especially given that I have (((controversial))) opinions. If my ideas and thoughts are publicly linked to me then the vultures and snakes would come to hurt not only me, but those around me that I love.

I can live with being attacked for what I think and do, and can defend myself. It is more difficult for me to justify putting others around me at risk for my own selfish reasons.

Once we have the means and ability we will LINK together in the future. If you know of any ways to do it safely now I am all ears.

I have a burner gmail that you can reach me at:
teslaclubber@gmail.com

>>14564087
>>14564167
we had fireworks this last weekend (not a burger)
they synchronized exactly with this latest price movement
>surely just a coincidence...lol

Most won't take the time to read this
For those that do, enjoy


A while back there was a clip that cirulated where a bitcoin maximalist said something to the effect of "if someone were to solve the oracle problem, it would be worth more than all of crypto"


He then went on to give the standard counterargument that sybill attacks fundamentally prevent resolution of the oracle problem.


He was almost right


Here's the reality: in isolation without external factors this is correct. Put differently: if all of crypto was created de-novo and no data/api providers existed before the advent of chainlink, there would exist an equilibrium at which sybill attacks would be more profitable than delivering quality data or outputs. If this was the case, there are ways of breaking this state, but they involve exchange of value first in a non-deterministic manner and then using the experience from that to bootstrap an oracle network.


Fortunately, before crypto the world did exist. This led to trust systems being developed to reign in this situation (lawsuits, word-of-mouth reputation, the value of name recognition) in a world of non-deterministic interactions. For chainlink this is an absolute blessing.


The entwork will launch with actors providing APIs and data that are linked to their real-world names and practices. This means that even outside of the sybill equilibrium, there will be significant pressure to have high quality inputs and outputs. A bank can't expect to keep its good name if it makes a habit of screwing its smart contract customers while keeping good practices with its standard customers.

So no more announcements today... nice one larpers. I’ve been duped again. REEEEEEEEE