/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55455161
>What's the likelihood
low.
but greater than zero

good sign that bottom is near, link "og" in his first full bull/bear cycle details how he's sold into btc and eth

>>52634304
Thanks for making these threads.
I just want you to know that your efforts over the years have been appreciated.
I look forward to these threads, and enjoy reading your responses. They always revitalize my hopium even when times are tough.
Thank you and good luck.

>>51180874
>fascinating

>>50755313
If there's a perk given to wallets that have held LINK for a long time, then that perk is for the wallets that have held LINK for a long time.

Your (and OP's) argument seems to be "but it's not fair what if I moved my LINK"
I think the obvious answer is, if the LINK moved then it's not eligible for whatever perk is given to wallets that held it.

It's not hard to understand or hard to comprehend what "long term holders" means.
If you feel sad that you may not be eligible for something because you moved your LINK and therefore no longer qualify as a "long term holder," then sure I can understand why you'd feel sad about that.
But that doesn't mean chainlink labs has to find a solution to that "problem." You simply don't qualify. That's not a problem that needs to be solved, even though you wish it was.

This whole argument that you can't possibly comprehend what it means for LINK to be in a wallet for a long time without moving is ridiculous. You do comprehend it, you just don't want to accept it.

>>50374553
>Reddit buys memes and cults of personality, and LINK is neither.
I appreciate your post but I have to point out that this is simply false.

>>29700852
I remember feeling pretty low back in summer of 2018 when it seemed that Link would never cross $.60 let alone a dollar ever again. There was SEC fud then, and tons of Discord shits like Astro shitting up the place. They’re probably still here, but just dropped the tripfagging.
I feel nothing now, and nothing will dissuade me at this point. I’m just enjoying the ride.

>>28667476
>Either biz is the mod or the team doesn’t want that out
OR...
And I'm just spitballing here...
But hear me out...
OR it's a fucking LARP and none of it is true.

>>28133099
>Checked and not looking and going to make it
I'll give you a hint. Bitcoin is up 12%, and LINK remains a $25 stablecoin.
>>28132888
>>28133099
>>28133100
>>28133199
goddamn check those digits

How has anyone not noticed this? I haven't seen this on here since the blog came out. Lets have a fresh breadcrumb thread.

https://blog.chain.link/what-is-chainlink/amp/

>>27567255
Checked.

>>26310224
D
E-
C
O
U
P
L
E
D.

>>26018908
>Link will dump to ~16-17, thats when I'll buy back in
wow
i mean i always hoped i'd hear people say things like this
but holy shit it's real
"dump to $16" ?? crazy

thank you assblaster, wherever you are

>>25936372
>Astrology whore majored in philosophy.

You know who else did?

>>24900118
>>24900336
POST MORE
IS THERE MORE?

>>23688510
AMEN

H

>>22653413

>>22351636

Let us bring him silver and gold ! Let us bring him silver and gold....

>>22277306

Why not?

>>21907777

witnessed

>>21560546
The best thing about watching BTC surge while LINK dips is the inevitable flip in a day or two while the money flows out of BTC and back into LINK.
Whales swing trading with LINKBTC always make the price go higher. Once LINK bottoms out, they trade BTC back to LINK and the fucker shoots upward again.

Feels comfy